New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(7198 previous messages)
rshow55
- 06:57pm Jan 1, 2003 EST (#
7199 of 7204)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
Feared by All, Even Giants and Tyrants By NATALIE
ANGIER http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/01/books/01ANGI.html
In "Pox," Ms. Hayden, an independent scholar
and marketing executive, presents the fascinating thesis
that many eminent figures in history very likely suffered
from syphilis and that the disease may explain at least some
aspects of their behavior, their career decisions and how
they accomplished their feats of divinity or defiance. Her
parade of likely or possible syphilitics includes Beethoven,
Nietzsche, Flaubert, van Gogh, Schubert, James Joyce, Goya,
Mary Todd and Abraham Lincoln, Al Capone, Ivan the Terrible
and Hitler.
Central to Ms. Hayden's premise is the fact
that in the later stages of syphilis the disease can affect
the brain in much the same manner as does manic-depressive
illness, another condition often associated with artistic
genius.
The idea is widespread that creativity is itself a disease,
explained as a disease and an aberration. A comforting
thought, in a certain way. But with just a little work, people
should be able to see that this idea that "creativity is a
disease" is wrong. Though the efforts involved in being fully
human can be a burden.
What would happen if people looked at the magical,
wonderful things we all do, and concluded that the
beautiful things "geniuses" do happened because these
"geniuses" were human beings - - and kept at it ?
We'd all be somewhat more ambitious and hopeful in spots.
And more humble in others.
rshow55
- 07:01pm Jan 1, 2003 EST (#
7200 of 7204)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
Looking back- 2002 was a good year - and I don't think, in
terms of what I can know, that we're so very far,
logically, from the hopes expressed in Someday At
Christmas by Stevie Wonder http://www.webfitz.com/lyrics/Lyrics/xmas/97xmas.html
Can we sort the remaining logical problems out soon
- and communicate them well enough so that people agree in the
ways that matter for action.
It looks possible to me.
People need to collect "the dots" and connect the
dots to form ideas - from the perspectives that matter to
them - and that fit what they know and then check those
ideas against other things - - and go at it again -- at
the same time evaluating their ideas in terms of order
and symmetry and harmony in the ways that make
aesthetic sense to them when applied to the particular
details of the case.
If people did this, and kept at it , we'd live in a
lot safer, more hopeful world.
Nobody would have to be any smarter than they are today.
I'm hopeful - and feel that we have time to get a number of
things sorted out.
So I'm taking some time, worrying about stability. But a
lot ought to be possible this coming year.
(4 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|