New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(6999 previous messages)
rshow55
- 05:24pm Dec 24, 2002 EST (#
7000 of 7012)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
It is my judgement that I am doing just exactly what I
promised Bill Casey I'd do - - and I believe that if Casey
were alive, he'd be astonished by some things, but very, very
pleased - and, right now, quite hopeful.
I think he would also give The New York Times as an
institution very high grades - - and might give pretty good
grades to many key people in the US government, as well.
Casey was a "closet intellectual" - and I was his
"experimental animal" in ways we both understood - and the
motivations for the work seemed sufficient to justify a lot -
to both of us. In the 1970's, Casey felt that the world
would blow up - and if not blow up, be unrelievedly
ugly for as far forward as the eye could see - unless some
tough problems were solved. I got fingered.
We may be able to do better than Casey feared, if not as
well as he sometimes hoped.
Someday At Christmas by Stevie Wonder http://www.webfitz.com/lyrics/Lyrics/xmas/97xmas.html
expresses wonderful ideals - and is a great thing to read.
Maybe someday soon - if we keep our heads, and work at it.
lunarchick
- 06:59pm Dec 24, 2002 EST (#
7001 of 7012)
Guiderails of truth would meet with Stevie's
approval:
rshow55
- 07:33pm Dec 24, 2002 EST (#
7002 of 7012)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
I've been trying to Send in clear rshowalter
"Science News Poetry" 2/14/01 7:18am for a long time.
The poem of rshowalter
"Science News Poetry" 2/14/01 7:18am ends with
this note:
In clear: Lying is more dangerous than people think,
and soaks up more attention than people know. We can do less
of it. We can send in clear - the message, almost always,
will be peaceful. And complex cooperation, now so often
terminated with deceptive sequences, could happen more
often. If the Guardian, the NYT, and some other
first line papers got together (with foundation support if
that was needed) and got some things checked we
could live in a much safer and more humane
world.
That may be too much to hope for. But if it is - people, in
the US, and other countries, ought to understand more about
why. Because "promises" and "opportunities" that America
seems to offer are, much too often - not really
available.
Adults need secrets, lies, and fictions To
live within their contradictions. <br?
But when things go wrong, And knock
about
Folks get together And work it out...
To work things out, people need to be able to
exchange and check a great deal - freely enough
that closure can actually happen.
We're in a mess about a lot of things - including key,
life-and-death matters of religion. http://query.nytimes.com/search/article-printpage.html?res=9905E7DF143AF931A35755C0A9649C8B63
We have some very good reasons to be careful.
We have to objectively, clinically, look at how people
actually behave -- including ways where people aren't
conscious, or rational -- - so that we can get a more
practical, and humane sense of what it is to be human beings.
If we did that, I think we could go a long way towards what
Albert Einstein was asking for when he said this:
" We must never relax our efforts to
arouse in the people of the world, and especially in their
governments, an awareness of the unprecedented disaster
which they are absolutely certain to bring on themselves
unless there is a fundamental change in their attitudes
toward one another as well as in their concept of the
future. The unleashed power of the atom has changed
everything except our way of thinking."
I think we're close to knowing enough to actually do as
Einstein asks - if we check our work - and set about it.
lunarchick
- 07:53pm Dec 24, 2002 EST (#
7003 of 7012)
Especially if so much is social construction!
(9 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|