New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(6971 previous messages)
lunarchick
- 07:30am Dec 23, 2002 EST (#
6972 of 6979)
France human
rights
lunarchick
- 07:40am Dec 23, 2002 EST (#
6973 of 6979)
War - people displacement - refugees - camps - resettlement
- crime - unemployment - poverty - child trafficking &
prostitution & slavery - cruelty - mental & physical
torture ....
War - Iraq
Europe wonders ....
Europe hasn't got over the Balkan disruptions yet ...
wonders if all displaced people should be put on flights to
America DIRECT!
rshow55
- 08:39am Dec 23, 2002 EST (#
6974 of 6979) Can we do a better job of finding truth?
YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and
worked for on this thread.
I repeated a joke about Stanford Deans, some long while
back, with just a small link inconspicuously placed fairly
close - and got an interesting reaction!
But it isn't a joke that Deans, and other academics, have a
lot of logical fencing skills, and some fine examples of that
skill are on display on some of Gisterme's recent
postings.
Though logic isn't everything - and quite often "bad logic"
offers good statistical guidance - especially when
things are checked in many different ways, though each may be
inconclusive alone.
Whoever gisterme is, (s)he has a lot of academic
skills - including some admirable ones. 6966-69 make some very
interesting points. As it happens, I think gisterme and
I, for all our many differences and our sometimes warm words,
share a great love for the United States - and a long list of
reasons to be proud of the United States and its people.
Gisterme , you're saying some substantial things -
some of which I agree with. And, by and large - I'll often
give you high marks on sincerity, as well.
On some other things, I have some of the same reservations
about gisterme that Paul Krugman has about GWB . Not
that Krugman is infallible, of course - - .
If I'm moving slowly, it is in part because I think some
things are going well - at a pace that is, if anything, a
little too fast for clean convergence.
Also, just now, I have to cook my wife breakfast, so she
can keep some promises. I'll be back - and I'm giving your
postings a lot of weight in my mind - because, over a long
time, you have shown a lot of effort and a lot of background.
In my view (and I'm subject to checking) some serious mistakes
and some indirection, as well.
lunarchick
- 10:57am Dec 23, 2002 EST (#
6975 of 6979)
IRAQ | Wonder if G has the Gist of this :
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/12/23/1040510971971.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/22/opinion/22FRIE.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,864722,00.html
Tommo is on the breakfast menu!
as seen at
Guardian Talk | International Gulf
Arabs turn on Saddam Hussein
lunarchick
- 11:25am Dec 23, 2002 EST (#
6976 of 6979)
http://www.webfitz.com/lyrics/Lyrics/xmas/18xmas.html
lunarchick
- 11:32am Dec 23, 2002 EST (#
6977 of 6979)
Truth outs!
(2 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|