New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (6965 previous messages)

gisterme - 03:25am Dec 23, 2002 EST (# 6966 of 6979)

gisterme 12/23/02 3:19am (continued)

"...(for example, the search facility has been eliminated)...

It's not the first time that has happened now is it, Robert? Of course not. You should go back and read some of the stuff you posted about probability and coincidence.

"...Gisterme , you're simply crazy to expect me to believe your unsupported word,..."

I can and do back up most of what I say, Robert. If I can't I back off. Why don't you?

"... or have special respect for your status..."

What status? The only respect I ask from you is that which any decent human being would offer any stranger. When I meet a stranger, I don't require him to prove everything he says before I'll believe it, especially when there's no reason to disbelieve. You say you judge...if you don't agree with what I say but can't show that it is untrue or even just wrong...please don't dis me by treating me as if it were. That just looks to me like poor judgement on your part.

"... - when you give me no reason to do either -..."

I expect you and others to believe me so long as I'm truthful; but I don't want or need any special respect from you or anybody else, Robert. Just basic respect will be fine with me. I'm not into respect descrimination and don't want my a$$ kissed, especially by you.

"...and when you deny that you have any status..."

You are a respecter of men, aren't you Robert? The only status I expect you to attach to me is that of a decent human being. So far as you're concerned that's the only status I have.

I can't help but think that your own ego is the only thing standing between you and the truth about my "status". I think you couldn't bear to face the fact that I'm just an ordinary member of the usually silent majority who has simply decided to speak up from time to time. I'd bet that facing up to that would have far less impact on your view of me than on your view of yourself.

"...As for me - I know very well that things have to be checked -..."

That's why I back up what I say. Why don't you?

"...and sometimes that takes a staff..."

Did Moses have a staff? I think so. So go out in the woods and find yourself a staff, Robert.

kalter.rauch - 03:40am Dec 23, 2002 EST (# 6967 of 6979)
Earth vs <^> <^> <^>

bbbuck 12/22/02 10:16am

I believe we should keep the worship of big bosomed good-looking chicks.

I must say...And I WILL SAY IT...that your work in restoring a healthy sense of "perspective" to this all too often politically correct forum consists of some of the most valuable contributions I have seen in a long time.

A healthy mind is housed in a healthy body through which pumps Good and Rich American Red Blood!!!

lunarchick - 06:20am Dec 23, 2002 EST (# 6968 of 6979)

Johnson's getting excited .. Dasha-Dancer-Prancer are making their way, carrying a big parcel of new monikers ... for America's redblooded 'J' to have some fun with on Christmas morning!

lunarchick - 06:44am Dec 23, 2002 EST (# 6969 of 6979)

North Korea - links

http://cns.miis.edu/research/korea/links/energy.htm
http://cns.miis.edu/research/korea/nuc/links.htm
http://www.duke.edu/~myhan/s-nk.html
http://www.fe.doe.gov/international/northkorea.html
http://polyglot.lss.wisc.edu/east/nkoreasymposium.htm

lunarchick - 07:17am Dec 23, 2002 EST (# 6970 of 6979)

"" Raped, beaten, sold - a child's view of Albanian gangs' vice grip on Britain http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,864581,00.html

lunarchick - 07:27am Dec 23, 2002 EST (# 6971 of 6979)

Sexual Offences Laws - France : children : standards

More Messages Recent Messages (8 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us