New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(6584 previous messages)
gisterme
- 05:52pm Dec 13, 2002 EST (#
6585 of 6594)
rshow55
12/11/02 2:33pm
"...- whether people found that they should "call me
Ishmael" or not..."
Thar she blows!
"...In my case, an intersting wrinkle on the "new forum"
of the internet is how reluctant people of all kinds can be to
actually get checking done to closure..."
Not just your case, Robert. Consider Ms. Boof and
what "checking to closure" might mean if there really were a
fatwa issued against her. That's an extreme case indeed but
one that demonstrates the wisdom of maintaining some
anonymity. After all, who knows when or why a fatwa might be
issued?
I disagree that there's no way to discern the difference
between facts and fantasies in the internet forum world.
People have common sense and knowledge of their own. They can
read and decide. If they believe a lie, they'll find out
eventually. People are genearlly not fools.
I don't think personal "names" are important in the web
forum world. Just as is true in personal relationships an
established web identity is the result of reltationships with
other web identies that's built over time. If somebody else
tried to post much under your moniker, Robert, it wouldn't
take me long to recognize that it wasn't you. If lchic's posts
suddenly began to have some focus on missile defense, I'd know
that wasn't really her. If somebody else tried to post as
gisterme, I'll wager that you'd know that too.
Just posting names on the web really doesn't mean much
either. For example I could look in the phone book of any
city, adapt a name I like and then claim on the web that
that's me. Just as others do, I could say "I'm listed in the
such-and-such phone book. Look me up".
I'd rather my web identity be uniquely recognized by the
characteristics of posted ideas, opinions and personality than
by association with my name; just as my body can be uinquely
recognized by the characteristics of its finger tips no matter
what name I might go by. And, oh by the way, "gisterme"
is a unique name. That's good enough for me.
gisterme
- 06:02pm Dec 13, 2002 EST (#
6586 of 6594)
almarst2002
12/11/02 4:13pm
"...A Bush administration strategy announced yesterday
calls for the preemptive use of military and covert force
before an enemy unleashes weapons of mass destruction,..."
"...Robert, still hopefull?..."
Can't speak for Robert, Almarst but I'd say that is
hopeful. Certainly more hopeful than a policy of waiting until
after weapons of mass destrution have been unleashed
before doing something about it.
gisterme
- 06:31pm Dec 13, 2002 EST (#
6587 of 6594)
almarst2002
12/11/02 4:50pm
"...Osama is a symptom..."
Oh? A symptom of what, Almarst?
"...You won't cure the desese by removing the
symptom..."
Nor will you cure it by trying to convince the immune
system that it is some other disease.
"...And I also recognise the logic of the Western
medicine leaning toward surgery..."
Surgery is especially useful when the cause of the problem
is known and surgery can help it.
"...Have you ever heard about Holistic approach?..."
Sure, Almarst. That's the approach we've been taking with
Saddam since the Gulf War.
"...Do you realy understand the reasons behind
events?..."
Of course I do.
"...The power breeds the ignorance and the feeling it
can and should rule. Even have God-given right to do so. While
forgeting the lesson it gives by doing that..."
Well said. That's the fundamental attitude that both Saddam
and Osama have in common, Almarst. I'd wager that it's the
forgotten lesson that will be their undoing.
rshow55
- 06:36pm Dec 13, 2002 EST (#
6588 of 6594)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
Gisterme , I'm impressed with some of the things
you're saying - and I'll take time to think, and respond
carefully.
I'm feeling hopeful - and thinking about a limitation that
I have - - and that may explain at least some of the problems
of Bin Laden - - and in some ways, Saddam, too.
Intellectuals, often enough, get themselves and others into
trouble.
Paul Johnson wrote a good book about that.
(6 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|