New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(6498 previous messages)
wrcooper
- 04:54pm Dec 11, 2002 EST (#
6499 of 6506)
Lou Mazza or Commondata:
Why were the SCUDs apparently hidden aboard the tanker
under bags of cement? Why the effort to conceal them as if
they were contraband?
If it could be show that they were intended for delivery to
a terrorist organization or a rogue state, I would approve of
the seizure. Otherwise, I don't think the U.S. has a right to
keep possession of the missiles.
almarst2002
- 04:55pm Dec 11, 2002 EST (#
6500 of 6506)
"There are things that people are going to be willing to
fight about"
I am very interested to know what Americans where fighting
for in the past century.
rshow55
- 05:05pm Dec 11, 2002 EST (#
6501 of 6506)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
almarst2002
12/11/02 4:55pm . . . that would be a very
interesting history to set out and discuss - with your point
of view vigorously represented.
I think American military actions have made a great deal of
sense - a great deal of the time - and think most people in
the world agree.
If you can argue that they've been at a lower moral
level than the military actions of other nation states over
the same time - - I'd like to hear the argument. I'd listen
hard.
It might civilize all concerned to have a better, more
complete airing of the questions you raise - in detail. There
are certainly trained people around the world - not too busy -
who could do a thorough job of compling such a record, and
connected arguments - given some money - and some ground
rules. Putin, for example, could probably pick up the phone
and organize it - getting the money from wealthy individuals -
if he wished. Other leaders could, too.
And yes, I've heard of "wholistic medicine.'
And I personally have been concentrating on negotiations -
alternatives to what you refer to as "surgery."
almarst2002
- 05:15pm Dec 11, 2002 EST (#
6502 of 6506)
"I think American military actions have made a great
deal of sense - a great deal of the time - and think most
people in the world agree."
I am lost on this. Could you name jast a few?
In my view, the only just war is the war to repel the
agression, economical blocade or at least a preemptive against
an imminent agression by a much stronger opponent. And
ABSOLUTLY nothing else.
rshow55
- 05:20pm Dec 11, 2002 EST (#
6503 of 6506)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
almarst2002
12/11/02 5:15pm
We don't agree. And I don't think your position permits
stable human relations.
But let me post this - and leave off for a while, to talk
to lunarchick.
(3 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|