New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(6485 previous messages)
commondata
- 02:55pm Dec 11, 2002 EST (#
6486 of 6506)
mazza9
12/11/02 1:47pm - In today's world if we are to establish
peace and tranquility then someone has to take on the
parenting role. The UN has failed in this respect. It ignores
the human rights violations that are occurring in Africa and
yet finds Israel guilty of racism! The Iraq issue is a no
brainer and yet a 17th resolution was needed to communicate to
Iraq it's non compliance with the first 16 resolutions
regarding their invasion of a soverign nation were not heeded
to.
This whole paragraph stands testament to the error of
rshow's repeated optimism. The UN is not a democratic
organisation - the big powers want and get monopoly and it's
they you should blame for any failures you percieve. And if
you want to talk about hipocracy, Mazza, why do you worry
about Yemen's 12 old scuds but not object to the US selling
nearly a billion dollars' worth of military equipment to
another 12th century social system in Saudi Arabia? I've just
read through the list of weapons that the USA exported in 2001
- the file was 4.6 megabytes.
During the two and a half years of this thread, militarism
increased, inequality increased, dependence on oil remained
total, civil liberties suffered, ecological degradation
continued at pace, a crazy cult declared war on the Western
world, the "missile defense idea" is spreading and growing,
and we never did quite manage to get rid of nukes by Christmas
2000, did we rshow?
rshow55
- 03:14pm Dec 11, 2002 EST (#
6487 of 6506)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
During the two and a half years of this
thread, militarism increased, inequality increased,
dependence on oil remained total, civil liberties suffered,
ecological degradation continued at pace, a crazy cult
declared war on the Western world, the "missile defense
idea" is spreading and growing, and we never did quite
manage to get rid of nukes by Christmas 2000, did we rshow?
I don't see it quite that way - though I can't dispute your
points entirely, either. I'm feeling optimistic, even after
reading your paragraph. Let me repeat a very optimistic set of
posts, for background - and then get back to the indented
paragraph above - point for point.
(19 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|