New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(6288 previous messages)
rshow55
- 02:31pm Nov 25, 2002 EST (#
6289 of 6294)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
Terrible human behavior is natural, too.
Mankind's Inhumanity to Man and Woman - As natural as
human goodness? Started by rshowalter at 06:08pm Nov 12,
2000 BST and ongoing since, begins with this: http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b085/0
" I'm trying to float and idea here - and that's something
these forums are good for.
"Looking at the world, there are so many cases of
"unthinkable" and "unexplainable" evil and negligence, that
the mind and heart recoils. People recall such behavior among
the Nazis, and recoil, as well they might. How could
"civilized, aesthetically sensitive, cultured people" ALSO act
so monstrously, and with such clear and sophisticated
murderous intent.
"But is this behavior so strange? Or is it the NATURAL
state of people, dealing with outsiders, outsiders who they
naturally dehumanize, and deal with as heartless, exploitive
predators? Is it civilization and mercy that are the
"unnatural" things - the things that have to be taught, and
negotiated into being, and strived for?
"I'm coming to think that it is just as natural for people
to act "inhumanly" - that is cruelly, and in a dehumanizing
way, towards OUTSIDERS, as it is natural for people to act
warmly, and with accommodation and mutual support, for people
WITHIN their group.
"I'm coming to the view that, just as there is an instinct
for language, and an instinct for becoming a part of a group,
inborn in humans, there is an instinct to exclude outsiders,
to dehumanize them, to withhold cooperation from them, and to
treat them as animals, subject to manipulation an predation.
I'm coming to believe that this treatment of outsiders is an
instinctive species characteristic, evolved over the millions
of years when people lived as gatherers and team hunters.
"If this is true, we all have the basic instincts to be
kind, sensitive, and good, within our groups, but at the same
time are naturally "monsters" in our behavior toward
outsiders.
" If this is right, the role of civilization is to find
ways of peace and effective cooperation where isolation,
conflict, duplicity, and merciless manipulation, including
murder, might otherwise occur.
rshow55
- 02:33pm Nov 25, 2002 EST (#
6290 of 6294)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
Lunarchick and I have been working hard, trying to
help find ways toward safer and more comfortable circumstances
that can be practical and useful.
The most important things we've been able to identify
connect very closely with many, many things that people
already do - often, and well.
Since so many problems have been solved in the past -
there's some hope that problems can be solved now, and in the
future. But enough things have gone wrong that there is plenty
of reason to be wary, and concerned about mechanics.
Luckily, even though there's plenty of muddle, a lot of
things converge.
When good solutions don't converge - what stops them from
doing so?
Some of the reasons involve mechanics - and problems with
complexity that will always be difficult - but that are more
tractable now than they've been before.
rshow55
- 02:35pm Nov 25, 2002 EST (#
6291 of 6294)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
This thread repeats itself - but according to the "fiction"
that it is built for staffed organizations - that's not an
intolerable fault.
A number of main points are collected and linked in 6000
rshow55
11/20/02 7:56pm
The "Putin Briefing" set out on this thread, March 17-23,
2001 and reposted on Mankind's Inhumanity to Man from
#340-356 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b085/383
covers a lot of other recurring themes.
There's been a lot of progress since the publication of
Muddle in Moscow http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?Story_ID=533129
, and though I don't know if Putin himself has ever so much as
looked at this board, some of the things that have happened in
Russia seem as if Putin and his people have been considering
the complexities http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b085/385
that they face, and often doing so with understanding. And
seem as if the "effective rate of return" http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b085/393
of actions has been thought about often enough, and sensibly
enough, for some good results..
(3 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|