New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(6194 previous messages)
almarst2002
- 10:55pm Nov 22, 2002 EST (#
6195 of 6213)
Lets conduct a small poll:
On a scale of 1 (the least0 to 10 (the gratest) what are
the 10 most concerning threats the World is going to face in
this century?
Here is my choice:
1. Bio-Terrorism
2. Deterioration of Environment
3. American Empire controlling the World energy resources
4. Widespread social upheavals, civil wars and revolutions
due to a growing economic inequality and deterioration of the
global economy
5. Future deterioration of the global economy due to the
wars and social instability
6. Global deficit of the fresh water supply sparking more
wars
7. Unprecedented waves of the migration of population from
areas affected first by spreading famine, wars and growing
economic gap between nations
8. Final collapse of what have remained of the so called
"leading democraties" busy of building anti-immigrant walls,
fighting terrorism and crime within and wars abroad. Forced to
spend more and more for defence and suppression of world-wide
social upheaval and unrest.
9. Increasing tendency to look for a scapegoat among
national minorities in a search of "simple solutions" for a
"simple problem" designed to satisfy the public in 30-sec.
"Politicomersials".
10. Accidental missile lounch which couldn't be stopped due
to the lack of the MD.
almarst2002
- 11:29pm Nov 22, 2002 EST (#
6196 of 6213)
But other sources describe the financial records as
“explosive” and say the information has spurred an intense,
behind-the-scenes battle between congressional leaders and the
Bush administration over whether evidence highly embarrassing
to the Saudi government should be publicly
disclosed—especially at a time that the White House is
aggressively seeking Saudi support for a possible war against
Iraq. “This is a matter of the foreign-policy interests of the
United States,” said another administration official, who
cited the need to prevent a rift in the U.S.-Saudi
relationship. - http://www.msnbc.com/news/838867.asp?0cv=KB10&cp1=1
9/11 Report Says Saudi Arabia Links Went Unexamined - http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/23/international/middleeast/23TERR.html
[Putin]"We should not forget about those who finance
terrorism," Putin said, noting that 15 of the Sept. 11
terrorists were Saudi citizens.... "What can happen with
armies, arms, weapons that exist in Pakistan, including
weapons of mass destruction?" - http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=524&u=/ap/20021123/ap_wo_en_po/bush_putin_28&printer=1
lunarchick
- 12:00am Nov 23, 2002 EST (#
6197 of 6213)
Threats and Risks C21
Existential Risks Analyzing Human Extinction Scenarios
and Related Hazards Nick Bostrom / Department of
Philosophy / Yale University http://www.nickbostrom.com/existential/risks.html
How to Debate the China Issue - Human Rights Without China
Bashing http://www.foreignpolicy-infocus.org/papers/china/index.html
Environment http://www.csrforum.com/csr/csrwebassist.nsf/content/e1g2.html
Bio-T http://engineering.dartmouth.edu/~ethreats/ethreats6.html
Nuke-Iraq nuclear-tipped "bunker-buster" bombs against
buried terrorist weapons in Iraq, should Congress approve
funding http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa083102a.htm?iam=momma_100_SKD&terms=white+paper+Threats+risks+international+2002
http://www.cdi.org/
Air Travel http://www.airsecurity.com/hotspots/HotSpots.asp
Berk-Research http://www.berkeley-research-term-papers.com/catalog/economy_7c.html
+ + computer hacking - e-mail - online realtime attacks
lunarchick
- 12:51am Nov 23, 2002 EST (#
6198 of 6213)
"" Willful Self-Destruction
15
Global war Together, the United States and Russia still
have almost 19,000 active nuclear warheads. Nuclear war
seems unlikely today, but a dozen years ago the demise of
the Soviet Union also seemed rather unlikely. Political
situations evolve; the bombs remain deadly. There is also
the possibility of an accidental nuclear exchange. And a
ballistic missile defense system, given current technology,
will catch only a handful of stray missiles— assuming it
works at all. Other types of weaponry could have global
effects as well. Japan began experimenting with biological
weapons after World War I, and both the United States and
the Soviet Union experimented with killer germs during the
cold war. Compared with atomic bombs, bioweapons are cheap,
simple to produce, and easy to conceal. They are also hard
to control, although that unpredictability could appeal to a
terrorist organization. John Leslie, a philosopher at the
University of Guelph in Ontario, points out that genetic
engineering might permit the creation of "ethnic" biological
weapons that are tailored to attack primarily one ethnic
group (see #11). http://www.discover.com/oct_00/featworld.html
(15 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|