New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (6113 previous messages)

rshow55 - 09:20pm Nov 21, 2002 EST (# 6114 of 6135) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

wordspayy 11/21/02 9:16pm - - identities make a difference.

If Putin asks George Bush the straight questions -- "do you file as gisterme ? " - the response might be "indirect" - but with more than 700 postings by gisterme - - Putin can get some very good statistical judgements. Though I don't credit the President with all of them - - some, I believe - are of such high academic quality that Rice deserves credit for them.

rshow55 - 09:22pm Nov 21, 2002 EST (# 6115 of 6135) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

When right answers really count, they have to "connect the dots" ( MD1055 rshow55 4/4/02 6:54am ) so that patterns emerge -- and to check those patterns

wordspayy - 09:23pm Nov 21, 2002 EST (# 6116 of 6135)

rshow55 - 09:20pm Nov 21 Jackass, A year back I came on this forum and you attempted to say I was Bill Clinton-in fact you made like 25 different posts with a hundred or so links trying to tell everybody I was Bill Clinton...You made it all so detailed, with links for each post-quite a work of effort...

You a moron with a mental condition!!

wordspayy - 09:24pm Nov 21, 2002 EST (# 6117 of 6135)

So show,

ASSUMPTIONS make an ASS out of U and Me

rshow55 - 09:26pm Nov 21, 2002 EST (# 6118 of 6135) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

2629-2631 rshow55 6/19/02 1:53pm

MD2631 cites MD262, which includes this:

"I'm thinking that a very few simple things, not embarrassing, not expensive, not difficult, would be good to do now. If some journalists could hear some recordings -- one from last week, between me and the C.I.A. - which NYT could get to if it wished -- and another that I'm guessing exists of a meeting between me and a trusted officer of the University of Wisconsin, Madison - - that could set things up for some graceful, simple steps."

Gisterme responded in MD2633 gisterme 6/20/02 3:05am and the response was especially interesting in light of the statistical argument about gisterme's interest embodied in postings MD2574-2590 rshow55 6/17/02 7:09am

Look at them and sample them for yourself.

Putin should ask simple, direct questions - and see that some simple things are checked.

rshow55 - 09:30pm Nov 21, 2002 EST (# 6119 of 6135) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

#339 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/364 is worth attention of any staff that reads this board.

More Messages Recent Messages (16 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us