New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (6107 previous messages)

wordspayy - 09:08pm Nov 21, 2002 EST (# 6108 of 6135)

Instead of worrying about Putin of Russia maybe your time would be better spent worrying about your own local environment.

rshow55 - 09:11pm Nov 21, 2002 EST (# 6109 of 6135) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

There's been a lot of quick filings by " the poster:" since

6063 rshow55 11/21/02 7:00pm
6063 rshow55 11/21/02 7:00pm
6063 rshow55 11/21/02 7:00pm
6063 rshow55 11/21/02 7:00pm

and

6084 rshow55 11/21/02 7:56pm

Perhaps because of the references to a fine contact , Joey Berlin - who perhaps has not been "protected" by a coccoon.

The number of filings by "the poster" since 6063 rshow55 11/21/02 7:00pm
ought to be of interest to any staff concerned with what the Bush administration is concerned about.

From where we are - honesty is in the interest of people of good will - - all over the world.

wordspayy - 09:16pm Nov 21, 2002 EST (# 6110 of 6135)

rshow55 - 09:11pm Nov 21, 2002 EST (# 6109 of 6109)

Why do you waste so much time and energy trying to figure out if a person is of stature. Why not just listen to what is being said and respond. Why do you think it is of such massive importance to know what party line they represent,endorse or come from? You do know what they say about ASSUMPTIONS right..

Assumptions make an ASS out of U and ME

rshow55 - 09:16pm Nov 21, 2002 EST (# 6111 of 6135) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

29 postings by "the poster' " - in dialog with himself in the last two hours.

Without any content - just fluff.

Somebody cares about some things that lunarchick and I are posting.

wordspayy - 09:17pm Nov 21, 2002 EST (# 6112 of 6135)

rshow55 - 09:16pm Nov 21, 2002 EST (# 6111 of 6111

You dumbass you are two characters played by one person...

wordspayy - 09:19pm Nov 21, 2002 EST (# 6113 of 6135)

This forum has nothing to do with content..If this forum was based on content only-it would have been shut down at least a year or more ago.

You have no foundation for the very issues you sit in a forum and squander..

Tell me,

in a systems level of analysis-what is everybody trying to do?

More Messages Recent Messages (22 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us