New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (6013 previous messages)

rshow55 - 08:45pm Nov 20, 2002 EST (# 6014 of 6024) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

almarst2002 11/20/02 8:40pm - - you've got many good reasons not to like the United States in all respects - or even any.

Still, on the question - "should Saddam do what he's agreed to do - and disarm?" - - - I think the answer's yes.

The US doesn't have to be angelic for me to think so.

lunarchick - 08:48pm Nov 20, 2002 EST (# 6015 of 6024)

What is the UNITED States ?

Isn't it a bunch of amalgamated 'Counties' populated by former Eurasians and Africans, who hang out together with guns!

Headed by the 'pipeline' Prince!

almarst2002 - 08:49pm Nov 20, 2002 EST (# 6016 of 6024)

lunarchick,

I deeply respect your concern about Zimbabwe. However, I think its for Zimbabvians and their immediate neighbors to sort out. Why the sudden explosion of humanitarian feelings from the old colonial master - GB?

BTW. Why not extend this to the native populations of Canada, America and Australia?

lunarchick - 08:51pm Nov 20, 2002 EST (# 6017 of 6024)

So what makes this amalgamation of riff-raff (US)superior?

almarst2002 - 08:53pm Nov 20, 2002 EST (# 6018 of 6024)

"for international order - deals have to be deals"

The biggest danger for the international order I am afraid, may come from this country.

It does not take a lot of research to come up with a pretty long list of breaking promises and ignored conventions. And the speed of the movement in this direction seems to increase day-by-day.

lunarchick - 08:54pm Nov 20, 2002 EST (# 6019 of 6024)

People everywhere are 'basically' the same.

They live in geographic zones that have common characteristics.

They live in tailored systems.

Some 'systems' work. Some better than others. Some systems just don't deliver!

There are commonalities and patterns between the systems.

What works.

What fails.

Which under pinning blue prints function?

Which fail!?

lunarchick - 08:56pm Nov 20, 2002 EST (# 6020 of 6024)

On 'International Law' and 'Law' ... it is forever being amended and re-dressed to accommodate changing environments and needs.

It's never 'fixed', never 'static'.

rshow55 - 08:58pm Nov 20, 2002 EST (# 6021 of 6024) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

almarst2002 11/20/02 8:49pm - - she noticed that a Zimbabwian editor got a United Nations award.

She doesn't have to be a Rudyard Kipling colonial to notice that.

Though Kipling had his moments:

3177 rshowalt 7/20/02 7:25pm ... 3703 rshow55 8/13/02 4:07pm

Mesopotamia .....1917 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee74d94/3625

Our Fathers Of Old http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?13@@.ee79f4e/241

More Messages Recent Messages (3 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us