New York Times on the Web Forums Science

Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.

rshow55 - 07:04pm Nov 20, 2002 EST (# 5995 of 5998)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

almarst2002 11/20/02 7:01pm - - if Iraq does what it says it will do - regime change won't be necessary - and oil-business advantages should go to Iraq, Russia, and France - not the United States.

almarst2002 - 07:13pm Nov 20, 2002 EST (# 5996 of 5998)

rshow55 11/20/02 7:04pm

I have no stake in who will get the Iraqi oil business. As long as it is done at least to some degree within moral norms and not on a bones of innocent people.

Am I asking for too much?

rshow55 - 07:18pm Nov 20, 2002 EST (# 5997 of 5998)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

I don't think so.

I think we're moving, with some honorable help from the Bush administration (help given with some thought, not by mistake) toward a situation that could deal with the real concerns that Almarst has cited on this thread - at the same time clarifying international law, and making it more workable:

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/283

Just a thought for a happy ending, based on the pattern in How a Story is Shaped http://www.fortunecity.com/lavendar/ducksoup/555/storyshape.html

Status Quo . . .

Initial Problem . . .

Exposition . . .

Complications . . .

Crisis . . . A superpower out of hand - - with plenty of muddle and danger.

Climax boom, crash -- . . . A few world leaders say, in public, "this is an intolerable mess -- there are muddles here -- we want the key facts and relations sorted out -- staffed to closure -- beyond question . . ."

to be continued .

Denouement . . .

Description of New Status Quo . . .

New Status Quo

I think some pretty satisfactory resolutions would occur, pretty naturally, once there was enough "news value" for public scrutiny -- along with formats that were able to handle the logical problems involved.

- - -

It seems to me that we're moving towards that.

Not towards moral perfection - but perhaps toward improvement - and essential clarification.

Bush is not my very most favorite person. But just now, in this instance, he is not putting himself above the law.

Or beyond reasonable questions.

almarst2002 - 07:19pm Nov 20, 2002 EST (# 5998 of 5998)

I wonder how deep is the American public understanding of the consequences of turning this country into Global Empire? Particularely in terms of financial cost, role of the military and personal freedoms.

New York Times on the Web Forums Science Missile Defense