New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(5817 previous messages)
mazza9
- 12:04pm Nov 16, 2002 EST (#
5818 of 5828) "Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic
Commentaries
The Iraqi people may be FREE sooner than expected with
minimal damage. The Sunday Times is reporting, "Saddam pays
Gaddafi $3 billion to give his family safe haven in Libya."
Rats
leave a sinking ship.
So much for lines in the sand.
Who gets credit if this policy succeeds and WMDs are
eliminated from the international equation?
rshow55
- 12:12pm Nov 16, 2002 EST (#
5819 of 5828)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
We need balances - - and one of the problems - and a
problem with Friedman's essay - is that people need to be
clearer on a big distinction.
The distinction between logical determination and
constraint.
We have to learn to live with both - but understanding
which is which gets rid of a lot of mistakes. Including a key
one Karl Marx made.
And a lot of mistakes a lot of essayists (including
Friedman) sometimes make. The distinction in important - but
not yet well embedded in either our language or our minds.
Iraqi circumstances constrain what can be done -
but within those constraints, a lot can be done
- by people making adjustments and arrangements that they are
free to make.
There are plenty of choices within the constraints -
and people have much choice in that sense.
People are not free to do things made impossible by
barriers that are, at a particular place and time,
unchangeable.
Here's an example of a key mistake - one of the more tragic
mistakes in history.
Karl Marx said that economics determines history -
and too many people bought into that nonsense.
Economic relations constrain - - what can be done --
but do not determine what happens within economic constraints.
Some things are causal. For instance - as a matter of
causality - I can't jump 20 feet into the air unassisted.
f=ma , and a little calculus that people know is right
- make that certain at the level of strict cause.
Some things are matters of constraint. I am constrained to
live within my budget - though I might write a check I can't
cover - at the level of physical possiblity - there are forces
that keep me from doing it - or at least - keep me from
doing it very often. Those forces can be thought of as
constraints.
People have to live within their constraints - and
must ask others to permit them to do so - - if they
can.
We all have a lot of choices left, with every reasonable
constraint satisfied. And a lot of things can be done with
disciplined beauty - and stability - and comfort.
mazza9
- 12:13pm Nov 16, 2002 EST (#
5820 of 5828) "Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic
Commentaries
For those of you who have been following the North Korea
kidnap episode, please answer me this question. North Korea
kidnapped some Japanese citizens in the mid 1960s. They
recently allowed one of the women who married an American
defector to return to Japan to visit family after all these
years. North Korean Japanese ralations are now strained over
this affair and the North Koreans are demanding her immediate
return.
Under International Law, what are the rights of the
kidnapper, (North Korea), in this case? Why is Japan "bent out
of shape". Surely the international community through the UN
should recognize that the rights of rogue state supercede the
rights of the individual! Oops, that is contradictory to the
UN's Human Rights code! Sorry for the sarcasm but as long as
dictators exist we cannot move to the next stage of evolution
in our cultural and political existence.
rshow55
- 12:14pm Nov 16, 2002 EST (#
5821 of 5828)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
mazza9
11/16/02 12:04pm - - if that happens - a lot of
people get credit. Dawn and I might even get a little. Bush
would get some - but people looking at what's been done might
be admiring - but still find that their admiration has some
limits.
I hope the story is right - it could be a very good
solution, from many points of view.
(7 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|