New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (5679 previous messages)

almarst2002 - 08:30pm Nov 12, 2002 EST (# 5680 of 5701)

The Washington press corps has come grudgingly to the recognition that George W. Bush is “malleable” with the truth, as the Washington Post delicately put it. Pressing for war with Iraq, Bush has been exaggerating his case so much that even CIA analysts are complaining, as a number of newspapers have now reported. - http://www.consortiumnews.com/2002/110402a.html

almarst2002 - 08:36pm Nov 12, 2002 EST (# 5681 of 5701)

The Australian government's culture of secrecy means the brutal conditions of asylum seekers are routinely covered up, writes David Fickling - http://www.guardian.co.uk/elsewhere/journalist/story/0,7792,837840,00.html

almarst2002 - 08:39pm Nov 12, 2002 EST (# 5682 of 5701)

Depleted Uranium: UN confirms radioactivity in Bosnia - http://english.pravda.ru/main/2002/11/13/39419.html

almarst2002 - 10:27pm Nov 12, 2002 EST (# 5683 of 5701)

The west's warlords will get their invasion, in spite of global opinion - http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,838829,00.html

mazza9 - 10:28pm Nov 12, 2002 EST (# 5684 of 5701)
"Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic Commentaries

Robert:

You babble about ILM and Bill Gates. Meanwhile the Army THEL shot down an artillery shell! You suppose that Gates' programming acumen and your direction would lead to a clear display of the futility of Missile Defense. Meanwhile the ABL is being fitted with the battle laser and battle management software to engage missiles during boost phase. Do you think the ABL commander will call, "Begin Primary Ignition Sequence!"

These events have been reported and are "checkable". Your musings are just that. Why would Gates even want to talk to you?

lunarchick - 10:59pm Nov 12, 2002 EST (# 5685 of 5701)

The poster above ---


    what do you think ---
    what do you contribute ---
    at which school of etiquette did you study ---
BILL -

    why should Bill talk to Bob ---
    at last a 'thinking question'
Bill has concerns for world health
Bob has concerns for world health

Bill looks for wide distribution of funds along lines that will do good for the majority
Bob has ideas and concepts that fit

Bill's pre-emptive enablers save lives
Bob has ideas for low cost distributed systems individual user that will enhance health and life

So it seems that Bill&Bob have lots in common


    Would have much to talk about
    Would share 'common ground'
    Read from the same and similar pages

lunarchick - 11:09pm Nov 12, 2002 EST (# 5686 of 5701)

Iraq

Were Iraq to look at the works of the USA founding Fathers and adopt 'universals' from them

their ability to implement might exceed that of the USA

    where cultural enclaves pre-dominate and override reason

lunarchick - 11:18pm Nov 12, 2002 EST (# 5687 of 5701)

On Am using Iraq Iran as battling pawns ... to keep strength of both lowest ...

How come intelligent nations fall for that ?
What did they think they had to gain ?
What was dangled?

Moral | stay well clear of 'trouble makers'

Where nations have a VISION, a PLAN, an AGENDA and are engaged with their people and neighbours then the chances of a dominant power interupting life are lessoned.

More Messages Recent Messages (14 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us