New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(5993 previous messages)
rshow55
- 07:04pm Nov 20, 2002 EST (#
5994 of 6004)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
almarst2002
11/20/02 7:01pm - - if Iraq does what it says it will do -
regime change won't be necessary - and oil-business advantages
should go to Iraq, Russia, and France - not the United
States.
almarst2002
- 07:13pm Nov 20, 2002 EST (#
5995 of 6004)
rshow55
11/20/02 7:04pm
I have no stake in who will get the Iraqi oil business. As
long as it is done at least to some degree within moral norms
and not on a bones of innocent people.
Am I asking for too much?
rshow55
- 07:18pm Nov 20, 2002 EST (#
5996 of 6004)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
I don't think so.
I think we're moving, with some honorable help from the
Bush administration (help given with some thought, not by
mistake) toward a situation that could deal with the
real concerns that Almarst has cited on this thread -
at the same time clarifying international law, and making it
more workable:
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/283
Just a thought for a happy ending, based on the pattern in
How a Story is Shaped http://www.fortunecity.com/lavendar/ducksoup/555/storyshape.html
Status Quo . . .
Initial Problem . . .
Exposition . . .
Complications . . .
Crisis . . . A superpower out of hand - - with plenty of
muddle and danger.
Climax boom, crash -- . . . A few world leaders say, in
public, "this is an intolerable mess -- there are muddles here
-- we want the key facts and relations sorted out -- staffed
to closure -- beyond question . . ."
to be continued .
Denouement . . .
Description of New Status Quo . . .
New Status Quo
I think some pretty satisfactory resolutions would occur,
pretty naturally, once there was enough "news value"
for public scrutiny -- along with formats that were able to
handle the logical problems involved.
- - -
It seems to me that we're moving towards that.
Not towards moral perfection - but perhaps toward
improvement - and essential clarification.
Bush is not my very most favorite person. But just now, in
this instance, he is not putting himself above the law.
Or beyond reasonable questions.
almarst2002
- 07:19pm Nov 20, 2002 EST (#
5997 of 6004)
I wonder how deep is the American public understanding of
the consequences of turning this country into Global Empire?
Particularely in terms of financial cost, role of the military
and personal freedoms.
lunarchick
- 07:22pm Nov 20, 2002 EST (#
5998 of 6004)
G'day
Technical-hitch
Transformation
(6 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|