New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (5337 previous messages)

lchic - 08:54am Oct 28, 2002 EST (# 5338 of 5341)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

I, said the Sparrow,

with my bow and arrow

Simple - it's that simple - to get to truth.

In the case of getting to the truth wrt who killed Kennedy - then

All known information

Additional information

Validation of it

has all to be sorted ... what fits where ... what doesn't fit and should be jettisoned

In 1963 - there wasn't the assistance of a computer database - everything was longhand

Something got missed

So who killed KENNEDY - why doesn't America find out - who killed him and WHAT was in it for them?

All the birds of the air

fell a-sighing and a-sobbing,

when they heard the bell toll

for ___________________________ RIP 1963

lchic - 09:00am Oct 28, 2002 EST (# 5339 of 5341)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

LOOK at the KING !!!!
LOOK at the KING !!!!
LOOK at the KING !!!!

The small boy in the MOSCOW theatre saw the naked terror of a man being beaten by those holding hostages in the MoscowTheatre and HAD TO SPEAK OUT!

The boy checked them - wanting the violence to STOP!!

His action precipitated the end of the seige.

lchic - 09:03am Oct 28, 2002 EST (# 5340 of 5341)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

The child had a VALUE SYSTEM - the child knew adults were acting badly!

lchic - 09:13am Oct 28, 2002 EST (# 5341 of 5341)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Cutting communication

Isolating parties

Preventing people from 'sharing space'

From sharing and advancing ideas

are Nazi tools of trade!

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense


Enter your response, then click the POST MY MESSAGE button below.
See the
quick-edit help for more information.






Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us