New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(5275 previous messages)
lchic
- 10:15pm Oct 26, 2002 EST (#
5276 of 5291) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
Information Feudalism: Who owns the knowledge
economy? au: Peter Drahos with John
Braithwaite pub:Earthscan
see full details http://www.earthscan.co.uk/asp/bookdetails.asp?key=3794
Peter Drahos talked about his new book on intellectual
property ..... it was informative and argued against extending
copyrights too long because society was denied and couldn't
build upon works (without heavy cost), mentioned the original
'intention' of such rights. FiveStar
The review below .... 1/2star :
ANY opinion about "intellectual property" is invariably
foolish according to Richard Stallman, the apostle of the free
software movement. That's because the term lumps together the
different debates about authors' rights, patents and trade
marks. We wouldn't mix up strawberries, toadstools and semen
if bureaucratic convenience one day led to the formation of an
International Reproductive Entities Organization in Geneva...
would we?
Peter Drahos, an Australian lawyer and researcher at the
University of London, and his collaborator John Braithwaite
are vulnerable to this criticism. Worse, their account gives
only the barest nod of recognition to the "authors' rights"
that protect the creators of words, music and images in most
of the world - and are akin to human rights. They deal in
depth only with the Anglo-Saxon anomaly that, in contrast,
sees copyright as property and hence as commodity - and with
patents.
But this narrow view is forgivable, given the highly
informative core of the book. IT IS a detailed account of how
some American corporations decided that they didn't like the
debates and tried to change the questions. As he tells it, the
World Intellectual Property Organization, based in Geneva, was
just too democratic, giving a voice to each member state,
including developing countries and those with authors' rights.
These countries are apt to form alliances for compulsory
licensing of essential patented medicines and against
Hollywood.
The corporate campaign went public with an article in
The New York Times by an executive of pharmaceutical
GIANT Pfizer. Drahos documents meticulously how it progressed
through subtle alliance-building and straightforward use of US
trade clout, to shift the debate downhill from WIPO to the
World Trade Organization. There, a participant told him, fewer
than 50 people shaped TRIPS, the Agreement on Trade-Related
Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, and thus reshaped
national laws - including the US's.
The book's title promises a new category of social
organisation. It's hype. But if you HAVE ever done any kind of
research, it's worth making the considerable effort necessary
to read this account of the ownership of information under
late capitalism. Who owns and controls your writings? And who
should own and control them? Separately, who owns, or should
own and control your patentable inventions? These debates are
much more alive than this rather fatalistic book makes out.
Mike Holderness is a member of the European
Federation of Journalists Authors' Rights Expert Group
lchic
- 10:25pm Oct 26, 2002 EST (#
5277 of 5291) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
Lies, Lies, Lies! The Art and Science of
Deception (book USA) au: Mark Frank of RuggersU
Are we humans inherently deceitful? When you get a gift
that you hate what do you do? You lie of course. Is
this a morally questionable thing to do or are some lies
necessary for the sake of social cohesion? Clearly lying
can have dire consequences and a world leader in the subtle
art of lie catching argues the popular mythology around
detecting deception amongst police interrogators is having
frightening implications.
Transcript: later 31Oct
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/science/mind/s710317.htm
http://abc.net.au/rn/science/mind/
Half the people on Death Row - are NOT GUILTY says Mike!
lchic
- 10:29pm Oct 26, 2002 EST (#
5278 of 5291) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
Prof-Mike speaks of 'micro' expressions ... fear / distress
/ fake-happiness
Someone good at spotting mirco expression is often good at
getting to truth in an interview.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So taking this into the politcal zone ... how do we tell if
Leaders are telling truths or untruths ... do Leaders actually
know if the scripted words they read are true?
bbbuck
- 11:16pm Oct 26, 2002 EST (#
5279 of 5291) 'The scoops are on the way'....
Do these freaks ever sleep?
(12 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|