New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(5194 previous messages)
rshow55
- 04:35pm Oct 24, 2002 EST (#
5195 of 5206)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
Mazza, I do worry about my judgement - - pretty often.
Especially at times when it seems to me that a lot of things
are moving in ways that could work out well.
What if some world leaders actually decided to permit some
facts to be checked? Or asked for it to happen. (The
mechanics, after the request from powerful actors, would be
easy.)
That would be wrenching, of course - but no more wrenching
than what Saddam did when he emptied his prisons. Not so big a
change as that - manageable.
We have a mess - a lot of it a mess about world views,
about information. Lies and counterlies. Distortions and
counterdistortions. Psychological warfare - and coverups - a
tangled web.
But there's a lot more talking going on than used to go on
- and a lot more ways of checking things are available than
there used to be.
When things are looked at from many different angles
- if what is said is actually matched to checkable
facts then a lot of what is said gets ruled out - or at
least modified. After a while - the odds of getting some key
things straight get pretty good.
Of course people often work hard to keep such checking from
happening. Often because they are afraid to admit what
they have said and done.
Reposted some things from this thread last year - about
facing the past. http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b085/402
lchic
- 05:04pm Oct 24, 2002 EST (#
5196 of 5206) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
'Universities were founded by people interested in
knowledge.'
not only but also
surely there's more
.... like growing a society
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/bbing/bbpromo.htm
lchic
- 05:12pm Oct 24, 2002 EST (#
5197 of 5206) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
Jared Diamond
Humans lived as hunter-gatherers for 5 million years, then
we (unconsciously) developed agriculture about 13,000 years
age. Were we better off? The farmers overwhelmed the
hunter-gatherers. How come? The fundamentally egalitarian
hunter-gatherers were replaced everywhere by hierarchical
societies supported by religion and complex political
organization. Was agriculture a bad deal for the vast scores
of individuals who supported those few in charge? And why did
Europeans overwhelm indigenous peoples all over the planet?
Dr. Jared Diamond offers a series of stunning answers to
these and a wealth of other questions about human societies in
his Pulitzer Prize winning book, _Guns, Germs and Steel: The
Fate of Human Societies_. That title is also his short answer
to who won and why. His richer answer looks to the antecedents
of guns, germs and steel: wild plants and animals suitable for
domestication; the axes of the continents (east-west or
north-south); and the differing areas and isolation of the
different continents. .... more
Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human
Societies by Jared Diamond
http://www.paulagordon.com/shows/diamond/ http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/bios/diamond.html
mazza9
- 05:45pm Oct 24, 2002 EST (#
5198 of 5206) "Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic
Commentaries
"We have a mess - a lot of it a mess about world views,
about information. Lies and counterlies. Distortions and
counterdistortions. Psychological warfare - and coverups - a
tangled web."
And we need look no further than you and lchic and the
manner in which you pollute this forum with you particular
brand of propoganda. Who cares what your relationship was with
Casey and the CIA? Of what importance is lchic's poetry when
it is off subject?
We can discuss and disagree on the facility of missile
defense but your personal angst has no business here. If you
wish to denigrate the US foreign policy and its governance
maybe you should consider moving to a place more amenable to
your belief systems. Maybe Australia with lchic!
lchic
- 06:36pm Oct 24, 2002 EST (#
5199 of 5206) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
GU threads || Moscow Theatre
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?50@@.3ba765cf/124
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?50@@.3ba76633/22
(7 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|