New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (5017 previous messages)

lchic - 03:06am Oct 19, 2002 EST (# 5018 of 5047)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

"" BRUSSELS, Oct 18: The European Union on Friday promised to "stay engaged with Pakistan throughout its transition to democracy" but warned of concerns at reports of "manipulation" in last week's polls. http://www.dawn.com/2002/10/19/top18.htm

lchic - 03:10am Oct 19, 2002 EST (# 5019 of 5047)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Pakistan - DAWN - Editorial NorthKorea
Omits mention of their supplying Uranium to NK

    "" What now? Since the US believes it enjoys the monopoly of deciding what is right and what is wrong for the world, and since ordinary mortals like us are supposed to look up to it as our guardian angel, will it also now be prepared to attack North Korea and bring about a regime change there? In that case, it will have to go even beyond that and aim at changing the political system altogether because North Korea is still run on Stalinist lines.
http://www.dawn.com/2002/10/19/ed.htm

lchic - 03:14am Oct 19, 2002 EST (# 5020 of 5047)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

"" Spanish diplomat resigns over Iraq

MADRID, Oct 18: A war of words erupted on Friday between Spain's conservative government and opposition parties after the top Spanish diplomat in Baghdad stepped down in protest at Madrid's support for a US-led military campaign against Iraq.

Spanish Foreign Minister Ana Palacio attributed the resignation of charge d'affaires Fernando Valderrama to "pressure and stress" in an interview aired on Spanish public radio.

"This is someone who has not been able to withstand a tense situation and has sought to justify this with a flimsy alibi," Palacio said. "Fear is only human, and life in Baghdad is very difficult," she added.

Her remarks drew scathing condemnation from the opposition Socialists, with senior party leader Jose Blanco blasting her for a "pathetic" attack on a government employee.

"No minister should allow herself to insult a public official," Blanco said. "The truth is that the government and the minister are nervous because they are finding themselves rather isolated over Iraq," he said.

Eager to add to the government's embarrassment, the communist Izquierda Unida (IU) party has requested that Palacio and Valderrama appear before the parliament's foreign affairs committee for further discussion of what it called his "courageous resignation".

Deputy Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy meanwhile blasted Valderrama for having breached the "rule of common sense", telling a press conference that any diplomat "must defend his country's position, whether or not he shares it privately".

Valderrama told national radio he had resigned because he could no longer represent his country's official views, which he described as "subordination to the American government" in breach of international law.

He said he had taken the decision despite its "very high professional cost". -AFP

http://www.dawn.com/2002/10/19/int1.htm

lchic - 03:17am Oct 19, 2002 EST (# 5021 of 5047)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Diffusionism and Acculturation

http://www.as.ua.edu/ant/Faculty/murphy/diffusion.htm

lchic - 03:35am Oct 19, 2002 EST (# 5022 of 5047)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

"There's a bomb with
'your name on it'
Stay!!
NO - don't get up to leave

lchic2002

~~~~

The danger of words |

http://www.united.non-profit.nl/pages/info13.htm

http://www.exchangehouse.ie/dangerofwords.htm

http://www.reintegration.net/europa/glossar_engl.htm

http://www.politeia.net/seminar/migration/Breidenbach%20paper.htm

http://earlybird.qeh.ox.ac.uk/rfgexp/rsp_tre/video/tr_4.htm (see diagrams)

More Messages Recent Messages (25 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us