New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(4909 previous messages)
commondata
- 07:01pm Oct 15, 2002 EST (#
4910 of 4916)
gisterme
10/15/02 4:00pm
Ummm, if by "manipulation" you mean private US companies
building the middle eatern oil fields in the first place just
to have the nationalized ... then I'd have to agree we're
manipulating ... however, it seems to me, that once I pay for
the gas in my tank, it's mine...no longer the property of the
supplier.
Where's this metaphor going? It reminded me of
Brigadier-General William Looney, US Air Force, director of
the bombing of Iraq:
They know we own their country ... we dictate the way
they live and talk. And that's what's great about America
right now. It's a good thing, especially when there's a lot of
oil out there we need.
Not a Public Relations dream is he? Nor was having the
Taliban as guests at President Bush’s Texan ranch only months
before September 11.
There will never be peace in Israel/palestine so long as
there are folks fomenting jihad. That's because it serves the
purpose of jihad to keep that pot boiling.
There seems to be the same sort of blind support for Israel
in the US as there is/was for the IRA and for the usual
reasons of tribal-religious ignorance-affiliation. It's a
local territorial dispute and it doesn't really become the US,
in its globally dominant position, to side with one side in
the face of international opinion set out in UN resolutions.
What about the rules?
What about the rules when you were arming Iraq in the 80's?
What about the rules as you're killing more people in Iraq
than the combined total of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs;
5000 children killed each month because of sanctions? How
would it be if someone were doing that to you?
You killed more people in Iraq than all weapons of mass
destruction ever.
Follow the trail of blood you've left back through the
recent past in Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Indonesia,
Cambodia, Vietnam, Nicaragua, Honduras, Chile ...
You are the terrorists.
gisterme
10/15/02 4:10pm
Bloody men delight in spilling blood especially innocent
blood.
Irony?
lchic
- 07:59pm Oct 15, 2002 EST (#
4911 of 4916) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
Follow American Foreign Policy post WWII
Exactly 'what' was it about
Almarst would say "OIL"
lchic
- 08:05pm Oct 15, 2002 EST (#
4912 of 4916) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
That the USA supported 'right wing incumbents' against
'popular' calls for democratic reform
Shows the USA foreign policy was totally 'out of step' with
their own domestic reforming logics -- why so?
lchic
- 08:11pm Oct 15, 2002 EST (#
4913 of 4916) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
Heirarchical logic UC/lc "Israel/palestine" Gisterme's
interesting and consistent usage
why not "israel/Palestine" ?
lchic
- 08:14pm Oct 15, 2002 EST (#
4914 of 4916) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
weak-kneed me-tooism
A term applied to an opposition leader who lost his term
(page1) http://www.fl.net.au/~pressco/anzapa/nec_43.pdf
http://www.fl.net.au/~pressco/anzapa/index.html
lchic
- 08:19pm Oct 15, 2002 EST (#
4915 of 4916) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
The locality, county, state, nation, and world have relied
on Strategy to lessen conflict.
Here's an historical example ... wonder how it might flesh
out between modern leaderships, theifdoms, kingdoms and
empires ... :)
... though, tried to overcome the problems with the
nobility. He married three of his daughters to leading thegns
in an attempt to bind the nobility closer to the throne. This
was an innovation: kings had tended to marry their daughters
to foreign princes
.... poor judgment was supposedly complemented by
personality defects. For example, there are references to the
"stunted weakness of his character". In particular, these
personality defects are exemplified by sudden acts of violence
...
... The causes for his defeat lie partly in the political
system he inherited, partly in the strength of the opposition
he faced and to some extent in the(his) character ....
http://www.fl.net.au/~pressco/history/ethelred.html
(1 following message)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|