New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(4810 previous messages)
lchic
- 11:59am Oct 11, 2002 EST (#
4811 of 4814) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
http://www.europedaily.com/
rshow55
- 12:22pm Oct 11, 2002 EST (#
4812 of 4814) Can we do a better job of finding truth?
YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and
worked for on this thread.
mazza9
10/11/02 11:55am - - I'm fully aware of how ineffective AA
technology is now. #330-339 in Psychwarfare, Casablanca - -
- and terror http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/352
sets out new technology - though only so new - - the
key reference on polynomial processing was written in 1989,
according to Casey's instructions - and has been on the web
most of the time since.
We need to accomodate the fact that technical progress
doesn't stop. Right now, the US is making huge strategic
errors, and making trillion dollar deployment errors -
because of a reluctance to face facts that would have shamed
Casey.
mazza9
- 01:42pm Oct 11, 2002 EST (#
4813 of 4814) "Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic
Commentaries
Robert
The Sep 30, 2002 Aviation Week reported that TRW is
developing a laser weapon for F-16s and other manned and
unmanned aircraft. It will be pod mounted and will have a 10km
range. It wll be capable of engaging ground and airborne
targets. It can be used against cruise missiles, (by gosh,
like the Spitfires that defended London from the V-1 assault!)
Why this amounts to a mini ABL system. Guess those nasty
bad guys will apply reflective coatings to their crusie
missiles. Good Luck!
It's just been announced that Buck Showalter will be the
new manager of the Texas Rangers. Tell the truth, aren't you
really a baseball manager with a journeyman's understanding of
math and no connection to the CIA? Now that you mention it,
there is a Stenglese tone to your punditry! I'll bet your
really George Will! Yep! By Gosh there's a W in your last name
and also one in George Will's. Ooh! The dots are lining up.
Question? "Who's on First?" "I Don't Know. "Third Base!"
(1 following message)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|