New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (4797 previous messages)

lchic - 05:17am Oct 11, 2002 EST (# 4798 of 4811)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

The Jackson-Vanik Amendment


lchic - 05:24am Oct 11, 2002 EST (# 4799 of 4811)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Saddam acquiring technology for 'long-range supergun' By Kim Sengupta and Rupert Cornwell 10 October 2002

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=341196

lchic - 05:38am Oct 11, 2002 EST (# 4800 of 4811)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Life's more serious these days

http://www.iranian.com/News/2000/December/bush.html

mazza9 - 10:24am Oct 11, 2002 EST (# 4801 of 4811)
"Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic Commentaries

lchic wants to know, "what happened in the Senate, (of the US), last night. The answer is quite simple.

TRUTH AND JUSTICE ALWAYS TRIUMPHS OVER IGNORANCE AND SUPERSTITION!

Any questions?

lchic - 11:26am Oct 11, 2002 EST (# 4802 of 4811)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Implying that the Senate has been known to fall victim to IGNORANCE AND SUPERSTITION!

lchic - 11:27am Oct 11, 2002 EST (# 4803 of 4811)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Nobel : Jimmy CARTER

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/international/AP-Nobel-Peace.html

Carter Center's Web site http://www.cartercenter.org/

http://www.nobel.no/

lchic - 11:29am Oct 11, 2002 EST (# 4804 of 4811)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

IGNORANCE

Implies that aspects of truth are hidden

TRANSPARENCY and CONTROL are therefore important to people's parliaments

rshow55 - 11:38am Oct 11, 2002 EST (# 4805 of 4811) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Not always. Lies and deception win much too often. Whether the Senate made the right decision, this time, remains to be seen. Senator Robert Byrd made an impressive argument to the contrary.

October 10, 2002 Congress Must Resist the Rush to War By ROBERT C. BYRD http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/10/opinion/10BYRD.html

More Messages Recent Messages (6 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Cancel Subscriptions  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us