New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (4740 previous messages)

lchic - 08:43pm Oct 7, 2002 EST (# 4741 of 4757)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

The Bush speech as reported nyt today .... yes ... well

That guy needs a speech writer!

~~~~~~~

Here's a Letter to an editor I chanced upon ..

One in ten Iraqis dead or deported

Letter to the Editor

AT the end of the Gulf war in 1991 the Shiites of southern Iraq rose up in rebellion against Saddam to try to shake off the dictatorship under which they had been living.

The uprising was brutally crushed by the Iraqi army and Saddam's nine internal security services. For example, in Amara (near Basra) they made the Shiites, or anyone who looked religious, lie down in the streets and then buried them alive under asphalt.

Some 60,000 to 70,000 people were killed in and around Amara in 1991. During the 1990s, the regime killed about 300,000 Shiites in southern Iraq.

These events, regrettably, were not the only crimes against humanity committed by Saddam.

In the Anfal campaign in the late 1980s, the Iraqi regime destroyed 4000 Kurdish villages in the north of the country. Between 100,000 and 150,000 Kurds were killed, some with poison gas. Around a million more people were sent into internal exile.

Since 1979, Saddam has been directly responsible for the deaths of approximately one million Iraqi citizens and a further one million Iraqi soldiers who died in wars which he instigated against Iran and Kuwait.

Between 1.5 and 2 million Iraqis have been internally displaced and a further 4.5 million Iraqi refugees are scattered across the globe. Altogether, 10 per cent of the Iraqi population has been killed or deported.

These statistics are well known to human rights organisations that have worked inside Iraq but sadly have received little coverage in the world media. Dr Leanne Piggott Lecturer, Middle East Studies The University of Sydney

DURING the Vietnam War, Communist fellow travellers and the anti-war movement claimed the US was only after Vietnam's oil. Note the fabulous wealth Vietnam derives from its oil.

G. Townley

Croydon Park, SA

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/sectionindex2/0,5746,ausletters1^^TEXT,00.html

rshow55 - 09:58pm Oct 7, 2002 EST (# 4742 of 4757) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

The lead front page story on Sunday was this:

Israel Set to Use New Missile Shield to Counter Scuds By MICHAEL R. GORDON http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/06/international/middleeast/06MISS.html

Israel is ready to use a missile defense to protect Tel Aviv and other major population centers if they come under fire from Iraq.

It includes an excellent interactive feature: Israel’s Antimissile System.

Impressive as the results of that system are - - the program illustrates the technical challenges of ballistic missile defense - especially for longer range missiles, and with the complications of decoys. The Isreali system might perhaps lend itself, at moderate cost, to some of the insights described described in the example of 4533-4547 rshow55 9/25/02 4:38pm . Radars and controls at the heart of the system, good as they are - might be subject to further improvement.

I posted references to MD4739-40 rshow55 10/3/02 9:06am and some later postings on a Guardian Talk thread Psychwarfare, Casablanca -- and terror #330 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/352

Including links to CIA and my security problems, 3774-3779 rshow55 8/17/02 5:58pm

Perhaps some of those security problems have occurred in the past because I haven't stated clearly enough why I felt I needed to be careful, and needed to be debriefed. It seems to me that the reasons for my feeling so ought to be clearer now.

When National Security Adviser Rice wrote this, I believe she wrote something profound and hopeful. I'm doing the best I can to help make it true.

" Today, the international community has the best chance since the rise of the nation-state in the seventeenth century to build a world where great powers compete in peace instead of continually prepare for war. . . . . . The United States will build on these common interests to promote global security. "

" The National Security Strategy of the United States," http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/20/politics/20STEXT_FULL.html . page 2.

For that to be true - we need to make decisions based on correct information .

We also need to make sensible judgements based on what we know - and ought to know. It is dangerous, and wasteful, for us to put too much faith in systems that are vulnerable, and can easily become ineffective.

More Messages Recent Messages (15 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us