New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (4692 previous messages)

rshow55 - 07:48pm Sep 30, 2002 EST (# 4693 of 4699) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

manjumicha , your posts
4653 manjumicha 9/29/02 8:05pm ... 4654 manjumicha 9/29/02 8:07pm
are great.

I've been a little off my feed, because I've lost my email contact with the world.
How easy it is, by pulling email, credit cards, and phone cards - to immobilize a person. . . .
After you've experienced that, as I have more than once - - you get a little less trusting.
My mamma (and Casey) both told me to be careful - and I've found that good advice sometimes.

But I'll answer your questions - in plain English, as you asked, early tomorrow.

Here's the short answer - - if tumbling is hard - - then a few more easy countermeasures
(especially a few easy countermeasures combined together) would be hopeless .

I'm sorry that THREATS TO USE NUCLEAR WEAPONS: The Sixteen Known Nuclear Crises
of the Cold War, 1946-1985 by David R. Morgan http://scienceforpeace.sa.utoronto.ca/WorkingGroupsPage/NucWeaponsPage/Documents/ThreatsNucWea.html is off the web. It was cited 36 times on this MD thread before March 2, 2000,
and discussed in a good deal of detail.

Morgan's piece has also been cited since March 2 in these posts.

69 rshow55 3/2/02 8:34am

990 rshow55 3/31/02 10:13am

1762 rshow55 4/25/02 6:54pm

1999 rshow55 5/4/02 10:39am

and more recently, since 4687 rshow55 9/30/02 10:51am

I'm glad commondata found it from another souce commondata 9/30/02 1:15pm : http://vicpeace.ca/centre/readings/nukeuse.htm

Reflective Coatings http://www.phy.davidson.edu/jimn/Java/Coatings.htm was also much discussed,
and cited 35 times, before March 2 on the thread, and these times since:

1263 rshow55 4/11/02 3:24pm ... 1621 rshow55 4/21/02 7:52pm

Gold foil, a 5000 year old technology - and gold plated mylar - a 40 year old technology - are effective enough that more special reflective coatings wouldn't be needed to defeat lasar "weapons."

But the issues that http://www.phy.davidson.edu/jimn/Java/Coatings.htm dealt with did
illustrate a good deal about how very "special" and vulnerable our "stealth" technology really is
- - at a time when huge bets are being made on the assumption that it is invulnerable.

I have an idea that in a few years, junior high school kids will look back and laugh at that assumption - and wonder how anybody could have believed it.

I'll be back in the morning.

lchic - 01:34am Oct 1, 2002 EST (# 4694 of 4699)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Spoilt rich kids - the sons of oil - are a curse on the world.

BinLaden is responsible for raising the costs of travel and general insurance.

He elevated Bush.

He will ( by not being declared 'dead' ) assist Bush in the forthcoming elections.

BinLaden is anti-world.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Russia & Chetnya have had disputes for over a thousand years.

In the current dispute the statistical evidence seems to suggest that 'male' Chetnyan guys have been 'wiped'.

If Russia wants to be seen as a 'great' country - then - why can't it reconcile with Chetyna - do a report on grievances ... and try to work them through.

lchic - 03:10am Oct 1, 2002 EST (# 4695 of 4699)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

If the culture of the world were compared to the life cycle ... at which points in the life cycle would the human most likely resort to violence?

When will intra-national culture mature to wisdom?

More Messages Recent Messages (4 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us