New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (4497 previous messages)

lchic - 06:13am Sep 24, 2002 EST (# 4498 of 4505)

Saddam has "military plans" for chemical and biological weapons - dossier http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=336177




F I S K
Prosecute Sharon for war crimes, Israeli women say
24 September 2002
In an astonishing letter to the Palestinian survivors of the 1982 Sabra and Shatila camps massacres, nine Israeli wo-men's peace groups have told Palestinians in Beirut that they support their efforts to indict the Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, for "war crimes'' committed against them almost exactly 20 years ago.
A Belgian court ruled earlier this year that it could not indict Mr Sharon for the killings, but more than 20 survivors of the massacre, whose lawyers include Mr Mallat, are now appealing against this decision.

Up to 1,700 Palestinians were butchered in the massacre by Lebanese militiamen allied to the Israelis. Israeli troops surrounded the camps as the killings went on but were told by their commanders not to interfere. Mr Sharon was Israeli Minister of Defence at the time and was forced to resign after the Israeli Kahan commission condemned him and several senior Israeli officers for not preventing the slaughter.
http://www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp?story=336097



Bush’s administration is attempting to garner support for a tough new resolution threatening Mr Hussein with dire consequences if he fails to comply. Meanwhile, if a renewed stream of leaks from senior officials is to be believed, it is making military preparations and plans for the day—presumably not very far off—when diplomacy fails.

That day seemed to come even closer at the weekend, when, following a meeting between
http://www.economist.com/agenda/displayStory.cfm?story_id=1351288
http://www.economist.com/





lchic - 09:36am Sep 24, 2002 EST (# 4499 of 4505)

Interesting how the 'dots' don't really play out until a sense of 'fairness', a feeling of justice being enacted, an attempt to set things right - for the record, has been played through.

If the call to 'tidy-up Iraq' were to come from countries of similar culture - then the polarised mindsets planning retribution might refocus on the issues not the players.

lchic - 09:53am Sep 24, 2002 EST (# 4500 of 4505)

Checking out the above-4499 using word tools one notes:

    Flesch reading ease ~~ 49.4
    Flesh-Kincaid ~~ grade scale 12
Does this have significance?

The matter of importance read:

    Refocus on the issues, not the players!
~~~~~~~~

Amusing myself in this deserted nuclear wasteland

Results for this post4500 are:

Flesch reading ease 62.8

Flesh-Kincaid grade scale 5.8

Suggesting communication with a wider readership - age ten up. Let's hope this message gets home.

More Messages Recent Messages (5 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us