New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (4393 previous messages)

lchic - 08:34am Sep 19, 2002 EST (# 4394 of 4409)

"" Even President Bush has made the connection: "It is important for Americans to know that the traffic in drugs finances the work of terror, sustaining terrorists, that terrorists use drug profits to fund their cells to commit acts of murder."

    Isn't he of the 'Oliver North' tradition himself?

lchic - 08:37am Sep 19, 2002 EST (# 4395 of 4409)

- Isn't the point re 'addicts' is that they are just that - addicted.

- Afghanistan, wasn't the US criticised for leaving the poppy crop economy well alone !

lchic - 08:44am Sep 19, 2002 EST (# 4396 of 4409)

"Saudi Arabia is just a large prison." http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/middle_east/806642.stm

commondata - 08:44am Sep 19, 2002 EST (# 4397 of 4409)

And on and on. Great read:

Ain't Nobody's Business If You Do : The Absurdity of Consensual Crimes in Our Free Country by Peter McWilliams, Jean Sedillos

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0931580587/qid=1032439438/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_1/102-7655475-9015317?v=glance&s=books&n=507846

mazza9 - 08:48am Sep 19, 2002 EST (# 4398 of 4409)
"Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic Commentaries

"..and government of lchic, by lchic and for lchic".....Is this your idea of improving the US government? Why don't you mind your own business?

commondata - 08:53am Sep 19, 2002 EST (# 4399 of 4409)

"..and government of lchic, by lchic and for lchic.." ... could not help but improve US governance.

rshow55 - 08:56am Sep 19, 2002 EST (# 4400 of 4409) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Arming the Arms Inspectors By JESSICA T. MATHEWS and CHARLES G. BOYD http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/19/opinion/19MATH.html is superb - - and very promising. As an "abstract solution" - I think it is a thing of discipline and realistic, practical beauty.

What a wonderful thing, for the whole world - if decisions went as Mathews and Boyd suggest !

It seems to me that people ought to consider two questions:

How could the points of the proposal be "fought out" in time - in the ways where "battles of ideas" have to get to closure (with adjustments of positions as they make sense) ?

How could the proposal, with sensible adjustments - be sold effectively, and in time - so that it would actually happen?

If this solution were actually argued to closure - and, with modifications, implemented - we'd be well on the way to a safer, better world - for America, for western culture - for islamic culture and its people -- for the whole world.

Muddles like missle defense would get solved almost automatically if the procedures and honesties this would require actually came into being, and actually were worked through to success.

More Messages Recent Messages (9 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us