New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(4374 previous messages)
lchic
- 01:58pm Sep 18, 2002 EST (#
4375 of 4383)
Empire: There is a big difference, of course. Apart from
the odd Puerto Rico or Guam, the US does not have formal
colonies, the way the Romans (or British, for that matter)
always did. There are no American consuls or viceroys directly
ruling faraway lands.
But that difference between ancient Rome and modern
Washington may be less significant than it looks. After all,
America has done plenty of conquering and colonising: it's
just that we don't see it that way. For some historians, the
founding of America and its 19th-century push westward were no
less an exercise in empire-building than Rome's drive to take
charge of the Mediterranean. While Julius Caesar took on the
Gauls - bragging that he had slaughtered a million of them -
the American pioneers battled the Cherokee, the Iroquois and
the Sioux. "From the time the first settlers arrived in
Virginia from England and started moving westward, this was an
imperial nation, a conquering nation," according to Paul
Kennedy, author of The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers.
More to the point, the US has military bases, or base
rights, in some 40 countries across the world - giving it the
same global muscle it would enjoy if it ruled those countries
directly. (When the US took on the Taliban last autumn, it was
able to move warships from naval bases in Britain, Japan,
Germany, southern Spain and Italy: the fleets were already
there.) According to Chalmers Johnson, author of Blowback: The
Costs and Consequences of American Empire, these US military
bases, numbering into the hundreds around the world, are
today's version of the imperial colonies of old. Washington
may refer to them as "forward deployment", says Johnson, but
colonies are what they are. On this definition, there is
almost no place outside America's reach. Pentagon figures show
that there is a US military presence, large or small, in 132
of the 190 member states of the United Nations.
So America may be more Roman than we realise, with
garrisons in every corner of the globe. But there the
similarities only begin. For the United States' entire
approach to empire looks quintessentially Roman. It's as if
the Romans bequeathed a blueprint for how imperial business
should be done - and today's Americans are following it
religiously.
Lesson one in the Roman handbook for imperial success would
be a realisation that it is not enough to have great military
strength: the rest of the world must know that strength - and
fear it too. The Romans used the propaganda technique of their
time - gladiatorial games in the Colosseum - to show the world
how hard they were. Today 24-hour news coverage of US military
operations - including video footage of smart bombs scoring
direct hits - or Hollywood shoot-'em-ups at the multiplex
serve the same function. Both tell the world: this empire is
too tough to beat.
The US has learned a second lesson from Rome, realising the
centrality of technology. For the Romans, it was those
famously straight roads, enabling the empire to move troops or
supplies at awesome speeds - rates that would not be surpassed
for well over a thousand years. It was a perfect example of
how one imperial strength tends to feed another: an innovation
in engineering, originally designed for military use, went on
to boost Rome commercially. Today those highways find their
counterpart in the information superhighway: the internet also
began as a military tool, devised by the US defence
department, and now stands at the heart of American commerce.
In the process, it is making English the Latin of its day - a
language spoken across the globe. The US is proving what the
Romans already knew: that once an empire is a world leader in
one sphere, it soon dominates in every other.
But it is not just specific tips that the US seems to have
picked up from its ancient forebears. Rather, it is the
fundamental approach to empire that echoes so loudly. Rome
understood that, if it is to last, a world power needs
(8 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|