New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(4161 previous messages)
kalter.rauch
- 03:06am Sep 4, 2002 EST (#
4162 of 4171) Earth vs <^> <^>
<^>
lchic
9/2/02 10:20am
The name 'Mandella' became the most
recognised in the world ....
Hmmmmmm...there's a South African ex-convict named Nelson
Mandela.
What did he do that seemed
'right/correct/good...?
Divorced his wife as soon as he got out???
You tell me......does he have ANYTHING to do with Missile
Defense?
kalter.rauch
- 03:22am Sep 4, 2002 EST (#
4163 of 4171) Earth vs <^> <^>
<^>
rshow55
9/2/02 12:39pm
Here's a countermeasure that I feel sure
would work. Suppose you have your warhead placed inside a
gold mylared spherical balloon - and it is one of N
balloons, of the same reflective mylar, of the same
sphericity, of the same diameter - from a given missile.
HOW is THAT going to work???
Say the hidden warhead is released along with the other
empty balloons at 10,000 mph......the warhead is going to
continue on at 10,000 mph, leaving the decoy balloons behind.
Even if the balloon shrouding the warhead were to miraculously
stay intact for a significant distance, simple sensors ought
to be able to detect the real warhead by its ballistic
trajectory......right?!?!?
lchic
- 04:24am Sep 4, 2002 EST (#
4164 of 4171)
Katter's raunchy posting on Mandella ... can't believe
moniker 'he she or it' doesn't know off the top of 'his her
it's' head as to where Mandella's creative stroke of genius
lies .... Come on -- think -- why is the name 'Nelson
Mandella' the most widely known name in the whole world --- he
did something people approved of --- what did he do?
{Nelson is with his 3rd wife - he imported this one)
lchic
- 05:56am Sep 4, 2002 EST (#
4165 of 4171)
Creativity (7)
Reading Dasgupta (1994) one is struck by the depth of
discussion entered into regarding 'creativity'.
WRT creativity in the sciences Dasgupta argues there is
'natural' and 'artificial' scientific creativity.
Natural science may be chasing down a truth - as did
Showalter here: Equation for Neural Conductance and
Resonance
Artificial science will involve the development of
artifacts (as advocated by Showalter here) .... to devise,
develop and use flahscards, within a system, for pre-readers
would involve artificial-scientific creativity. Dasgupta
notes Kuhn (1962) 'the scientist solves puzzels within the
framework or confines of a given paradigm - and revolutionary
science, during which an entire paradigm may be supplanted by
another. (p8)
Professionals reach agreement as to whether an entity in
their domain - a theory, an idea, a design - is important and
influential in advancing 'the state of the art'of that domain.
...... more ...
(6 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|