New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(4136 previous messages)
rshow55
- 07:44pm Sep 2, 2002 EST (#
4137 of 4141)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
I don't know enough about Cooper to judge in some areas (if
Cooper is a real person) - but looking at the works of George
Johnson from the perspective of Piaget is interesting, too.
wrcooper
- 08:17pm Sep 2, 2002 EST (#
4138 of 4141)
No, I'm not a real person, Bob. I'm actually George W.
Bush.
Hiya, partner.
My lieutenants told me I'd better check you out, because
you're causing great consternation in the high councils here
in our nation's capital. Damn, boy, I wish to hell you'd just
shut up.
Listen, I've had my security people watching you for a
while now. I hope you don't mind. Some influential
journalists, like my good friend Ann Coulter, have been
following you, too. We're using you to gauge the opposition to
my BMD program. So goes Showalter, so goes the nation. We
don't like what we're seeing.
Sorry me and my good friend George Johnson are using the
same login name here. It was the easiest thing to do. What can
I say? You want me to say I regret it? Okay, I do, but I did
it for national security reasons. I had good reasons, Bob.
Listen, I just hope we'll persuade you, boy. We're working
hard to make this thing work, and it's for all our benefits.
Why don't you lay back for a spell, and give me and the
fairhaired boys down at the Pentagon a chance to make this
thing work. We know we can do it, and everybody'll sleep
better at night if we do.
I admire your gumption, Bob, but your passion's misplaced.
Give it a rest, will you?
Thanks.
--George W. Bush, aka Cooper, Johnson, gisterme, et. al.
PS Now that I've let the cat out of the bag, I hope you'll
ease up on me. Give us in Washington a chance to do our work
in peace...for peace.
Bye!
rshow55
- 08:26pm Sep 2, 2002 EST (#
4139 of 4141)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
MD4116-4117 rshow55
9/2/02 9:07am
This thread has many of the difficulties, and strengths, of
pretrial discovery.
I said that it seemed likely that gisterme is
Condoleeza Rice, and gave my reasons.
People could check.
- - -
4058 rshow55
8/31/02 9:32am
Casey wanted better answers.
He didn't know how to do any better than he did, given the
risks he saw, the situation he was in - and the terrible
stupidity and ignorance both around him and within him.
He was stumped.
So were the Russians.
We can do a lot better now.
- - -
I've got plenty of reasons to work on this thread - both in
terms of duty, and for straight economic reasons, too.
And it will be worthwhile to discuss the work of
George Johnson (not that he's Cooper at all - but he does have
a certain point of view) in terms of Piaget. And truth that
is, somehow, too weak.
wrcooper
- 08:37pm Sep 2, 2002 EST (#
4140 of 4141)
This is George Johnson this time.
You can examine me in light of Piaget all you want, but
it's not going to change how I think, and it's not going to
change the fact that your opinions represent a dangerous
aberration that requires the strongest possible refutation.
You will be checked and checked thoroughly.
It is not for naught that we saw to it that you began
posting here in the New York Times. This is a controlled
venue. We know who you are and where you are.
Don't call the CIA again. It won't do you any good. If you
want to talk to us, just whisper into your pillow.
(1 following message)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|