New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(4105 previous messages)
rshow55
- 06:16pm Sep 1, 2002 EST (#
4106 of 4118)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
It seems likely to me, from some things gisterme has
said, and an angry response to references about Stanford, and
deans, that gisterme is Condoleezza Rice.
Politicians or journalists could easily check it. They
might have good reasons to. I don't care that much.
Gisterme has made the interesting postings
gisterme has posted.
Whoever gisterme is, s/he works hard -- and when
Putin and Bush were meeting last year - was active, minute by
minute, working on what seemed to me as "spin control." If
gisterme is not affiliated with the administration --
s/he's an impressive loyalist indeed.
I might also be wrong about my guess that kangdawei , who
posted about 80 times in August and September last year was
Ann Coulter - though she did put Coulter's web site below her
name.
All anybody can do is "connect the dots" - make patterns,
and then check them.
The checking part if very difficult for people to
acknowledge. I've been resting mostly today, but thinking
about the reasons, too. How can people be so very smart
sometimes - and so stupid other times?
That's Plato's problem.
A major concern people have had for 2500+ years - and a
question linked to many, maybe most stories that make the news
to this day.
As for the point I've made, that it is about 1000 to a
million times easier to defeat the BMD systems I've seen than
build them - there's been a lot of detail about that,
undisputed for a long time. So much that I'm taking my time
thinking about how to present it. It has been carefully
presented already. MD84 rshow55
3/2/02 11:52am links to a lot of that discussion.
wrcooper
- 11:51pm Sep 1, 2002 EST (#
4107 of 4118)
You've got serious delusions of grandeur, Showalter.
Condoleeza Rice? Ann Coulter? These important people would
flock to a public opinion board to debate a math grad student
from UWI-Madison and an obscure Aussie socialist? Are you
absolutely nuts? Who on Earth would have the patience, yet
alone the time, to read through your voluminous, repetitive,
hypergraphic ruminations? I don't. I doubt that senior
administration officials or their staffers do, either. Get
real!
BTW, I'm still waiting for answers to my questions.
I'd appreciate it if you'd simply state your source(s) and
explain how you arrived at the figures we discussed yesterday.
You're the person who's a stickler for "checking." So allow
me to check. Give me your sources for independent
verification. Explain your methods.
mazza9
- 12:58am Sep 2, 2002 EST (#
4108 of 4118) "Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic
Commentaries
Cooper:
I saw "Spy Kids" tonight on HBO and they made more sense
than Robert. The blindness that children exhibit is the
blindness that Robert exhibits ergo quae cum ita sunt" Robert
can't answer your questions. To Bad!
It was reported that the Russians will not meet the Salt II
launcher and warhead limits as planned. While I suspect that
these are aimed at China and not us(US), the deteriorating
state of their overall systems suggests that defense measures
are important. The garage door analogy may have been
apochraphyl(sic) but in this era defensive measures should be
taken.
When I got my MBA I was a grad assistant in the MIS
department. My prof was really impressed by the movie "the
Forbin Project" where a US and Russian computer link up and
"take over the world" to protect humans from themselves. Who
knows, maybe Robert is Forbin!!!
lchic
- 07:49am Sep 2, 2002 EST (#
4109 of 4118)
MBA I was a grad assistant in the MIS department
'the poster' Admits to having a Masters of Bulldust Admin
in the MIS-information dept!
lchic
- 07:57am Sep 2, 2002 EST (#
4110 of 4118)
Colossus: The Forbin Project_ WWW Index This page
unfortunately suffers from link rot. Submissions
gladly accepted. The Movie. Colossus: the Forbin Project ....
www.stanford.edu/~mgritter/colossus.html
1969 http://tdi.uregina.ca/~complit/genthree.html
(8 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|