New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (4064 previous messages)

rshow55 - 10:31am Aug 31, 2002 EST (# 4065 of 4079) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

wrcooper 8/31/02 9:56am

in the meantime, I'll adress your question with things already said (and checkable) on this thread, mostly since March 2000, but some before that time.

Things that have been checked, in large degree.

I think a reasonable person, looking at the thread as a whole, would be likely to agree that the Bush administration already had something like a million dollars of staff work devoted to gisterme's responses.

If I'm wrong about that - the point could easily be checked by politicians or journalists.

A rather complete record exists of this thread, and is being made available. 3145-48 rshowalt 7/19/02 9:16am

It shows I make mistakes sometimes. But it will work as pretrial discovery , as well.

There are times that it seems to me that may be just what is needed.

lchic - 10:33am Aug 31, 2002 EST (# 4066 of 4079)

.... so why don't they send you 'That Letter' and let you get on with the rest of your life .....

lchic - 10:43am Aug 31, 2002 EST (# 4067 of 4079)

Chicago suburb - 78 years to clean up corruption
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,783879,00.html

lchic - 10:51am Aug 31, 2002 EST (# 4068 of 4079)

Islam conference
Sect opposes protests and
brands terrorists as sinners
http://www.guardian.co.uk/ukresponse/story/0,11017,783862,00.html

rshow55 - 10:53am Aug 31, 2002 EST (# 4069 of 4079) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

lchic 8/31/02 10:33am

Because there is a criminal conspiracy - - and if I were free to work - - the odds are just too great that I'd take them apart.

There may be another explanation, but by now, for the life of me I can't see how any other makes sense.

An interesting thing - - any of a large number of people could solve my problem - - and I've had enough interactions (with US Senate offices, for instance) to be quite sure that this thread is being read - - but America is afraid.

Star Wars , and US nuclear policy, have been aberrations, that have persisted because standard checks and balances in the US political system were bypassed.

I believe that Americans and everyone who must deal with Americans (and everyone whose life is endangered by American actions and mistakes -- which is everyone) ought to carefully consider the concerns about the “military-industrial complex” set out in the FAREWELL ADDRESS of President Dwight D. Eisenhower January 17, 1961. http://www.geocities.com/~newgeneration/ikefw.htm and consider what has happened since.

America is afraid .

Afraid to a degree that Eisenhower could have barely imagined.

We have work to do. It is a hopeful time.

But a terrible time, too.

lchic - 10:57am Aug 31, 2002 EST (# 4070 of 4079)

Interesting how Americans see OUR world from their home perspective ... http://www.guardian.co.uk/ukreponse/comment/story/0,11443,773023,00.html .... wonder what conclusions would be reached had these two studied NYT v EU press wrt ME

More Messages Recent Messages (9 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us