New York Times on the Web Forums Science

Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.

rshow55 - 03:58pm Aug 27, 2002 EST (# 4001 of 4001)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Most problems in the world that are really important - most I can think about anyway - can be explained clearly, in ways that work for almost everybody, once they are fully understood.

Once they are really understood, they can probably be explained, in a clear, intellectually solid, beautiful and entertaining way in a good cartoon using Disney characters - - http://www.whom.co.uk/squelch/world_disney.htm A cartoon that can be understood and enjoyed by everybody involved.

For reading instruction - that would have to include the teachers, the parents, and the kids.

The key issues in missile defense are simple, too - - and ought to be explainable to the same people.

The "Mickey Mouse" test is a very tough standard. One I can't meet, so far. But it is the right one to shoot for, for things that really matter, and are really fundamental.

The reasons why things go wrong would often stand out - if more people looked at what was going on with the sharp eyes it took to make these characters. http://www.whom.co.uk/squelch/world_disney.htm

Why, exactly, is it that problems don't get fixed? Often enough, though the answers are ugly - they are also "obvious."

3794 lchic 8/18/02 9:40am

3796 lchic 8/18/02 10:01am to 3800 rshow55 8/18/02 12:43pm

Does anybody really doubt that N! and N!/2 are concepts too difficult for Mickey Mouse to explain?

Somebody needs to explain what hope means - - and what hopeless means - - when we face the statistical choices that we often do.

Teenagers who could never learn to read would have something to teach about that. And if we as a culture understood their problems - we'd have something to teach them back.

New York Times on the Web Forums Science Missile Defense