New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(3883 previous messages)
lchic
- 01:38am Aug 22, 2002 EST (#
3884 of 3891)
"In days gone by, the most venerated journalists found
their news among the people," said Hartigan in a speech about
the future of newspapers. "They congregated in pubs, among the
coppers and crims; they sniffed out their scoops in bars and
public places, and they talked to people, face to face, living
the truism – you don't find news hanging around the office.
"Today we find our reporters from tertiary-educated
backgrounds, where so many seem to aspire to present A Current
Affair – but know nothing of, and seem to resent, the years of
experience and work it takes to get there.
"Today we are in danger of producing a generation of
journalists who know people only over the telephone – and
then, only hear the views of spin doctors, whether they be
corporate or political.
"Today, the tendency is for the top journalists,
particularly those known as the opinion-makers, to dine in the
best restaurants, be seen in all the right places and live in
the best addresses.
"Today the tendency among snob journalists is to observe
the world from a quiet and carpeted office; to contemplate
where one might go for a superior coffee or cuisine, to sit
back and let the press releases roll in, to choose the news
from wire services, agencies or handouts, rather than getting
out there and finding it – fresh and raw."
~~~~~
From my point of view, I'd much rather have a specialist,
the more experienced journalists, doing the work, because they
understand the issues better and they are able to make better
judgments, examine things more critically and recognise trends
in a particular area," Smith says. "With a lot of younger
journalists that aren't specialists in their field, I think
they've got an instinctive response to put up the shutters."
Of some solace is the view of Smith and other issues
management consultants interviewed for this piece that there
is still a strong body of senior journalists in newsrooms
despite the intrusion of the PR industry – providing both
mentoring and wisdom to those new to the job.
"At the top end of the media, they are better than ever,"
Smith says. "The best of journalism is better than it's ever
been, but I've got concerns about the middle and the next
generation, because the nature of media has changed.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,4937038%5E7582,00.html
End
lchic
- 02:36am Aug 22, 2002 EST (#
3885 of 3891)
A vision of dystopia
This is for real, not the sequel to a sci-fi thriller. The
World Bank paints a picture of a catastrophic global future if
we do not change the way we live
Larry Elliott, economics editor Thursday August 22, 2002
The Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldsummit2002/story/0,12264,778754,00.html
lchic
- 02:40am Aug 22, 2002 EST (#
3886 of 3891)
"" So what is the Bank's blueprint for sustainable
development? It says:
· developing countries should act to clean up their
governments, promoting participation and democracy,
inclusiveness and transparency as they build the institutions
needed to manage their resources;
· rich countries need to be less selfish by increasing aid,
offering more generous debt relief, opening their markets to
developing country exporters and helping transfer technologies
needed to prevent diseases, increase energy efficiency and
bolster agricultural productivity;
· civil society organisations should be encouraged to serve
as a voice for the weak and powerless, and to provide
independent verification of public, private and
non-governmental performance;
· private firms should be more focused on sustainability in
their day to day activities, and have incentives to pursue
profit while advancing environmental and social objectives.
kalter.rauch
- 04:47am Aug 22, 2002 EST (#
3887 of 3891) Earth vs <^> <^>
<^>
bbbuck
8/22/02 1:13am
Because I like lchic's posts.
Back off, dude......lchic insulted me first! She hates ME
the MOST!!!
lchic
- 07:38am Aug 22, 2002 EST (#
3888 of 3891)
From GU thread
"" The White House has been hijacked. We have been
terrified into supporting a war-for-profit, because, as
Hermann Goering put it, 'they have told us we are being
attacked.' Our economy is being bled dry, the constitution
has been shredded and the ones profiting are the Bush gang
and their wealthy backers.
The harsh reality is; Mr. Bush and his shadowy bunch ,
do not respect elections, Congress, the constitution,
freedoms, do not respect Democrats or Republicans. In short
they operate entirely above and beyond the law.
(3 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|