Missile Defense

rshowalter - 12:13pm Oct 9, 2001 EST (#10204 included this:

"I usually don't go back and look about how postings can change - instead, I usually read them in downloaded form. But old postings can change - for instance, a poster can change contact information.

"I notice that kangdawei now has a "contact heading" of http://www.uclick.com/client/cap/ac/2001/09/26/index.html which connects to Ann Coulter. Now that isn't certain evidence that kangdawei is Coulter - but it is a connection -- and I expect, after a little thought, to contact Ann Coulter and see if we have something to talk about.

I'd like to do that for a lot of reasons -- including some mixed motives - - she's a good looking lady -- maybe even better looking than Ms Rice !

Coulter's writings are entertaining, too. And well written in ways that I wouldn't know how to match, though it would be fun to learn, except that it might get too complicated, everything considered . . . .

rshowalter - 01:10pm Oct 9, 2001 EST (#10205

But maybe we could have a date. I could take her to the Patent Office, for a day of real searching - - on something specific - - maybe two days. So she could learn what "impossible" means . .

and what hope means, too, in technical fields.

Just a thought. I need to read some of her stuff, and collect my courage, before I call her - - then, just my luck, she'll be unavailable.

I made an effort to contact Coulter through a number of channels, including web contacts and phone calls. I believe that she listened to me over her answer phone, without commenting. I think I can fairly say that Ann Coulter, according to journalistic usages of the phrase, "made herself unavailable."

She had every right to do so.

But I was sorry that we couldn't make better contact --- even to deny that she was "kandawei" . It seemed a reasonable inference, both from the contact line http://www.uclick.com/client/cap/ac/2001/09/26/index.html and from the writing style of the postings - that "kangdawei" was Ann Coulter. There were 45 "kangdawei" postings - that I show below (they are available on the archive CD) along with boded posting responding to "kangdawei" by two posters I respect a great deal -- applez and almarst.

Within a day after my efforts to contact Ann Coulter, http://www.uclick.com/client/cap/ac/2001/09/26/index.html ceased to work.

rshow55 - 01:56pm Aug 11, 2002 EST (#3641 of 3643)

kangdawei's postings, which I have on CD, make interesting reading. She worked hard:

Missile Defense #9858 - kangdawei Sep 26, 2001 10:17 pm
Missile Defense #9862 - kangdawei Sep 27, 2001 06:25 pm
Missile Defense #9863 - applez101 Sep 27, 2001 07:35 pm
Missile Defense #9866 - kangdawei Sep 27, 2001 09:32 pm
Missile Defense #9867 - kangdawei Sep 27, 2001 09:51 pm
Missile Defense #9868 - kangdawei Sep 27, 2001 09:56 pm
Missile Defense #9871 - kangdawei Sep 27, 2001 11:34 pm
Missile Defense #9887 - kangdawei Sep 28, 2001 09:05 pm
Missile Defense #9891 - kangdawei Sep 28, 2001 10:46 pm
Missile Defense #9892 - kangdawei Sep 28, 2001 10:58 pm
Missile Defense #9893 - kangdawei Sep 29, 2001 04:27 am
Missile Defense #9894 - kangdawei Sep 29, 2001 04:36 am
Missile Defense #9895 - kangdawei Sep 29, 2001 04:56 am
Missile Defense #9897 - kangdawei Sep 29, 2001 07:18 am
Missile Defense #9901 - kangdawei Sep 29, 2001 10:05 am
Missile Defense #9903 - rshowalter Sep 29, 2001 10:11 am
Missile Defense #9904 - applez101 Sep 29, 2001 10:40 am
Missile Defense #9905 - kangdawei Sep 29, 2001 11:48 am
Missile Defense #9911 - applez101 Sep 29, 2001 04:11 pm
Missile Defense #9941 - kangdawei Sep 29, 2001 07:23 pm
Missile Defense #9942 - kangdawei Sep 29, 2001 07:26 pm
Missile Defense #9944 - kangdawei Sep 29, 2001 07:28 pm
Missile Defense #9946 - kangdawei Sep 29, 2001 07:29 pm
Missile Defense #9947 - kangdawei Sep 29, 2001 07:29 pm
Missile Defense #9948 - kangdawei Sep 29, 2001 07:30 pm

(2 following messages)

New York Times on the Web Forums Science Missile Defense