New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(3517 previous messages)
lchic
- 08:52pm Aug 5, 2002 EST (#3518
of 3545)
Kids the world over backpack and hostel
and get along fine - so just why can't everyone -
the whole of the time ? lchic2002
mazza9
- 08:53pm Aug 5, 2002 EST (#3519
of 3545) "Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic
Commentaries
Yes, the Cold War was Ugly. I suppose suggesting that the
environment was less than polite is probably the
understatement of the millennium!
You can credit the Soviet Union with a herculean
accomplishment. From 1908 to 1938, Russian society evolved
from a 1600 serf society to a 20th Century industrial society.
Watch the movie or read "Doctor Zhivago" and you can perceive
the change that occurred. But at what cost? Remember, there
were many US socialists who visted Russia in the FDR 30s' and
returned to the US exclaiming that they had "seen the future
and it is now!". Of course, they hadn't seen the Gulag or the
millions of Cossacks in the Ukraine who were starved to death.
Now President Bush is trying to draw them close,
acknowledge a new found friendship so that the educational an
industrial power can be focused on improving their lot and the
rest of the world's.
Some people think that SDI bankrupted the old Soviet Union
and along with their foolish entry into Afghanistan and
Chernobyl brought about their collapse. If so then the SDI
investment was worthwhile.
Just look at today's news. We hold hearings and talk about
'interdicting", (I like that word), Saddam and all of a
suddent they want to talk about resuming weapons inspections
and meeting the requirements of the UN resolutions that arose
from the Gulf War. Teddy had it right. Speak softly and carry
a BIG stick. Maybe those iodine lasers on the ABL won't ever
be needed to shoot down missile but they still might be useful
as anti meteor/asteroid weapons when we begin to travel to
Mars, the outer planets and then the stars!!!Ad Astra Y'all.
lchic
- 11:50pm Aug 6, 2002 EST (#3520
of 3545)
Interdiction has proven to be popular http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?127@167.5CZCaAadQIs^4851856@.f28e622
On cooperation within economies - or how the not so rich
survive - see ManchesterU sociologist on Peasants (who compose
2/3 on earth today) ***** http://www.newscientist.com/opinion/opinterview.jsp?id=ns23541
The Guardian is reported today as saying the greatest
threat to world peace is ..... drum roll .... GeorgeW Bush
- such a perceptive publication with a pulse on world issues.
If the citation turns up will post. GU.com
Japan's non-nuclear policy under threat Audio: As the
nation commemorates the bombing of Hiroshima, Jonathan Watts
in Tokyo hears government sources suggest that Japan's
long-standing non-nuclear policy is not 'legally binding'
(2min 14s).
On Iraq Scott Ritter "This isn't American
democracy in action," said Mr Ritter. "It's the failure
of American democracy "
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,770374,00.html "This
is deadly serious stuff," the former UN chief weapons
inspector Scott Ritter, an outspoken critic of the war plans,
said yesterday. "He is not briefing about a cricket match. He
is briefing about war options."
Mr Ritter, a marine corps veteran and Republican, said he
was in no doubt that the Bush administration was committed to
military action. "I keep hearing from people that they are
bluffing. They are not bluffing. The Bush administration is
going to go to war come hell or high water. The decision has
been made."
.... "I can't think of anything funnier than a handful
of congressmen walking around," said Mr Rumsfeld. "They'd
have to be there for the next 50 years trying to find
something. It's a joke."
GU search - on Bush (Iraq) http://search.guardian.co.uk/search97cgi/s97networkr_cgi?QueryText=bush&Action=Search&Collection=Archive&ResultTemplate=ArchiveFull.hts&SortSpec=VdkPublicationDate+Desc
UK MP's Opposition to war http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4476912,00.html
Military
Tony Blair's military advisers are privately expressing
deep anxiety about the Bush administration's seemingly
inevitable march to war against Iraq.
seattlesky2
- 12:13am Aug 7, 2002 EST (#3521
of 3545)
To the others:
Have you seen this object? Do they have one here? Have you
seen this also? And Why is it necessary.
http://familyfriend.freeservers.com/Index1.html
Please respond to the email attached.
lchic
- 01:12am Aug 7, 2002 EST (#3522
of 3545)
Said to rain EVERYDAY in Seattle ... didn't open - presume
object was an umbrella, fella.
lchic
- 01:58am Aug 7, 2002 EST (#3523
of 3545)
Disquiet grows over Iraq http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/story.jsp?story=322242
lchic
- 02:12am Aug 7, 2002 EST (#3524
of 3545)
Fisk - Afghanistan http://www.independent.co.uk/search.jsp?keywords=fisk&submit=Go
lchic
- 02:19am Aug 7, 2002 EST (#3525
of 3545)
Terrance Hicks told by Aussie PM - that it's ok for David
Hicks to be 'held' by the US ... Terrance must understand that
his son was taken during a 'military' operation
WOW!
David's bid to have is case (wot case?) heard in the USA
has failed.
lchic
- 02:22am Aug 7, 2002 EST (#3526
of 3545)
GU thread - Friedman http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?50@@.2cbe6397/0
(19 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|