New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (3486 previous messages)

lchic - 03:31pm Aug 4, 2002 EST (#3487 of 3510)
"America is a giant. But its political class often seems to have the mind of a child. And a giant with the mind of a child is very dangerous — not only to those amongst whom he roams — but to himself." George Galloway MP

H.E. Mr Kofi Annan, Secretary General of the United Nations

Excellency,

At the outset I would like to express thanks and appreciation for your earnest effort in bringing the ongoing dialogue between us to reach a comprehensive solution to the outstanding problems between Iraq and the United Nations, so as to insure the implementation of all the requirements of Security Council resolutions, especially your sincere efforts during the round of talks in Vienna during the period of 4-5 July 2002.

Noting our agreement during that round of talks on continuing communications including the continuation of technical talks between the United Nations and Iraq, I have the honour to inform your Excellency of the desire of the Government of the Republic of Iraq to conduct a round of technical talks between Iraqi experts and the Chairman and experts of the United Nations Monitoring and Verification Commission (UNMOVIC) in Baghdad at the earliest agreed-upon time to review what was accomplished in disarmament issues during the period May 1991 until December 1998, to look into the remaining issues as viewed by the former UNSCOM which were included in the report of Ambassador Amorim to the Security Council on 30 March 1999, and to study and assess their importance and decide upon measures to resolve them when the inspection team returns to Iraq.

Excellency, the meeting of the experts from the Iraqi side and the Chairman and experts of UNMOVIC that we are suggesting does not carry a premature judgement on the opinion of Iraq or that of UNMOVIC regarding assessing what was achieved on disarmament issues, but rather aims at reaching a common ground on the scientific and practical criteria that will be adopted to treat and resolve what UNMOVIC might see as pending issues in the disarmament stage.

The suggested meeting will be in harmony with, and follows up on the suggestions you made in August 1998 to conduct a comprehensive review to the disarmament file and assess the degree of Iraq's implementation of its obligations.

We believe that this review will be an important step towards the appropriate legal and technical assessment and treatment of the issues of disarmament, and to establish a solid base for the next stage of monitoring and inspection activities, and to move forward towards that stage including agreeing on the practical arrangements to resume cooperation between Iraq and UNMOVIC in a way to strengthen the common ground to progress towards a comprehensive solution and a concurrent implementation of all the requirements of relevant Security Council Resolutions.

I would be very grateful if you would convey my letter here to the members of the Security Council.

Accept, Excellency, the assurances of my highest esteem.

Dr Naji Sabri, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Iraq, Baghdad, 1 August 2002

lchic - 03:32pm Aug 4, 2002 EST (#3488 of 3510)
"America is a giant. But its political class often seems to have the mind of a child. And a giant with the mind of a child is very dangerous — not only to those amongst whom he roams — but to himself." George Galloway MP

http://www.bbc.co.uk/cgi-bin/search/results.pl?q=letter&uri=%2Fhome%2Ftoday%2Findex.live.shtml

rshow55 - 03:57pm Aug 4, 2002 EST (#3489 of 3510) Delete Message

Careful language from the Iraqis quoted in lchic 8/4/02 3:31pm . Care in drafting that is to be admired, whatever other shortcomings may be involved in the situation.

When distrust is necessary for basic reasons, as it often is, and when the possibilities of deception and error are present, as they most often are,

- distrust and POLITENESS have to go together.

Distrust and tact - distrust and a knowledge that everyone is indirect, and that everyone remains human, have to go together.

MD3424-25 rshow55 8/2/02 7:37am

lchic - 06:30pm Aug 4, 2002 EST (#3490 of 3510)
"America is a giant. But its political class often seems to have the mind of a child. And a giant with the mind of a child is very dangerous — not only to those amongst whom he roams — but to himself." George Galloway MP

Some are more indirect than others, in fact indirectness in certain cultures ensures that folks don't know if they are coming or going.

Showalter just been chatting with an interesting contact who has close family in tx and visits regularly ... government workers ... it's a small world.

lchic - 06:37pm Aug 4, 2002 EST (#3491 of 3510)
"America is a giant. But its political class often seems to have the mind of a child. And a giant with the mind of a child is very dangerous — not only to those amongst whom he roams — but to himself." George Galloway MP

Interesting to note that 'International' articles now predominate in this list - the last item is intersting http://www.nytimes.com/gst/pop_top.html

lchic - 06:49pm Aug 4, 2002 EST (#3492 of 3510)
"America is a giant. But its political class often seems to have the mind of a child. And a giant with the mind of a child is very dangerous — not only to those amongst whom he roams — but to himself." George Galloway MP

Those darn fangled gagets

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=garage+door+electronic+opener+nuclear&btnG=Google+Search

phazer?

More Messages Recent Messages (18 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Email to Sysop  Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us