New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (3464 previous messages)

lchic - 07:36pm Aug 3, 2002 EST (#3465 of 3470)

Your 'corrected' post said as you say (above) - your inital post (later 'cut' by you) said as I say!

wrcooper - 07:46pm Aug 3, 2002 EST (#3466 of 3470)

lchic 8/3/02 7:36pm

Bullsh!t. Showlater said he saved the posts. Ask him to check it. You'll see I never said I worked for RCN Chicago. I don't and never have. Are you faking it, or are you and your Madison buddy as crazy as you come across?

rshow55 - 07:48pm Aug 3, 2002 EST (#3467 of 3470) Delete Message

She's not faking it. I have the post - and for a reasonable person, the implication was very clear.

wrcooper - 07:49pm Aug 3, 2002 EST (#3468 of 3470)

Post it, then, you freaking head case. Show me what I wrote.

wrcooper - 07:59pm Aug 3, 2002 EST (#3469 of 3470)

rshow55 8/3/02 7:48pm

The key word is reasonable. That, you and your shadow aren't. You're both nutty as hell. CIA. Condaleeza Rice. Bill Clinton. CIA. Etc. You're delusional.

Get help. I beg you.

You are crazy. Let me repeat. You're certifiable.

lchic - 08:03pm Aug 3, 2002 EST (#3470 of 3470)

.

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Email to Sysop  Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense


Enter your response, then click the POST MY MESSAGE button below.
See the
quick-edit help for more information.






Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us