New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(3147 previous messages)
kalter.rauch
- 04:24am Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3148
of 3327) Earth vs <^> <^> <^>
mazza9
7/17/02 3:12pm
I was drawn to this forum by the premise
stated regarding Missile Defense. I didn't join to have
words with lchic who needs a tutorial in Emily Post polite
behavior.
When they continue their rudeness I ignore
them.
Uhhh...Pardon Me, Mr. Lou Mazza, but from what I've seen in
these forums you ignore all kinds of people who aren't even
rude to you. If you're going to rely on Emily Post's dictums
on civility then you should at least practice what you preach.
I mean, how rude do you think YOU appear when you pointedly
ignore posts directed to you which ARE "on topic" AND
respectful of your "sensibilities".
Personally, I think Emily Post must be the ultimate Prima
Donna. She's like the "Princess and The Pea" who was
intolerably irritated, in spite of mountains of soft padding,
by what everyone else would regard as insignificant.
There's only ONE PERSON I totally ignore in ALL the NYT
forums and she knows why! I joined NYT forums when they were
still posting people's e-mail links. Within a week this
airhead was sending me messages demanding to know whether or
not I was "Psrain", along with a pile of crap about who she
hated and wanted to get banned. I told her what I thought of
her, and ever since then she pops into forums to push MY "hot
buttons".
Now, you must realize that the nature of this topic is one
bound to inflame people one way or the other. That's why
fanatic left-wing sell-outs like lchic exercise their
scatological impulses with their nasty NAZI smears. They
mustn't be ignored! Rather, they must be FORCED into
submission by a bombastic blitzkrieg of balderdash......
lchic
- 04:54am Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3149
of 3327)
LEFT TODAY TOMORROW Future
CENTER Fence-Sitter
right
yesterdayMen
YESTER-U?
kalter.rauch
- 05:21am Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3150
of 3327) Earth vs <^> <^> <^>
Why Tokay?______Y2K______White OK!
"c" is for CONSPIRACY 'cause it won't work for MY
slogans...but it does for YOUR'S!!!
lchic
- 05:35am Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3151
of 3327)
"" For all the individual warmth and generosity
of its citizens, the US is organised on a ruthlessly
competitive principle: in life there are winners and losers.
lchic
- 06:15am Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3152
of 3327)
""It's time for Congress or an outside commission to
investigate our nation's biodefense program and establish
oversight http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/19/opinion/19KRIS.html
Missing Anthrax / KRISTOF
kalter.rauch
- 06:18am Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3153
of 3327) Earth vs <^> <^> <^>
I grow weary...I will now seek refreshment and rest
awhile......
wanderer85us
- 06:51am Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3154
of 3327) Bush and Cheney - inside traders - bad apples
that need to be tossed out.
Bush's motto:
Leave no defense contractor behind.
rshowalt
- 09:16am Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3155
of 3327)
Formatting's not right -- but with Mark Heuman's wonderful
help I'm working to "publish" a CD that archives this thread,
from the beginning, with some collected searches and comment.
Eventually with a search facility, and other things useful for
"connecting the dots." Here, not exactly as it appears, but
with the content, is the index page, as now:
M. Robert Showalter: Missile Defense Archive
Calendar
of NYTimes Missile Defense Discussion
Auxiliary
and Summary Files
(more)
(172 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|