New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (3125 previous messages)

rshow55 - 07:55pm Jul 17, 2002 EST (#3126 of 3327) Delete Message

Now, if the CIA would only acknowledge in writing or in a clearly traceable way that I could use, what they've already told me, my wife, and my shrink -- verbally -- a lot might be sorted out. I sometimes wonder why they won't. To my certain knowledge, lchic and I aren't the only ones who wonder the same thing. MD3096 rshowalt 7/16/02 10:25am

A key posting about checkable facts: MD2116 rshow55 5/9/02 9:34am

A lot connected to what I said in MD2770-2771 rshow55 6/29/02 7:59am can be checked in many ways - - involving things said on this thread, and involving other checkable things, as well.

With some fact checking -- there's enough detail, I believe, to make a case in court - in the US, or elsewhere.

I believe that it would be in the national interest (as well as my own) for me to pursue things that far.

I shouldn't have to.

Getting to the truth, and honoring committments, is quite often the most efficient, most stable, as well as the most satisfying thing to do - - for all concerned.

Especially when people, both in the US and outside it - - are watching. As they may be in the case of this thread - which has been so active since September 2000.

lchic - 09:50pm Jul 17, 2002 EST (#3127 of 3327)

Back to agrarian roots mixed in with a little old fashioned religion:

Africa: the country that has been the granary for others and itself in lean times of drought --- the people went to the granary and what did they there? They found that a government minister had sold off the contents of the national granary and put the cash in his pocket.

One day, Pharaoh, the king of Egypt had a dream where he saw seven fat cows on the River Nile. Afterwards, The seven fat cows were eaten by seven thin cows. Joseph was known to have the ability to explain dreams, so he was called to the house of Pharaoh. After listening to Pharaoh’s dream, Joseph told Pharaoh that the seven fat cows resembled seven years of prosperity in Egypt, and the seven thin cows meant seven years of starvation following the seven good years. Pharaoh was to choose a wise man who would store food in the years of plenty to be used in the years of famine. Pharaoh knew that Joseph was this man, and he therefore appointed him governor of the land of Egypt.
http://www.jesusanswers.com/christian/stories/joseph.htm

It seems Africa is still in need of good govenance, as is America .... aren't the corporate maggots devouring of the beast - leaving seven starving major corporations - a simmilar problem?

The American 'maggots' have names - two such have high postitions - one takes tea occasionally with 'stadiumFiller' Billy Graham .... the term 'CASHCOW' has mooed into new meaning!

lchic - 09:59pm Jul 17, 2002 EST (#3128 of 3327)

Helicopter crashed - why?

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=Sikorsky+S-76&btnG=Google+Search

lchic - 05:11am Jul 18, 2002 EST (#3129 of 3327)

IRAQ Hussein ""Democrats and Republicans said there was broad bipartisan support for ousting Mr Hussein, even if that requires a military invasion if other options fail. But many said they were concerned that the administration was moving toward a major commitment of American troops under a veil of secrecy, with too little consultation with Congress. Members complain that much of what they know comes from news leaks." http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/18/international/middleeast/18IRAQ.html

Time USA/WORLD Foreign Policy went to the Parliament.

    Just supposing the US had elected a loonyTune DoctorStrangeLove for President .. who'd put a similar band around him .... who'd be responsible for the consequences - why the Parliament - so - the peoples houses ought to get the US onto a managable track!

lchic - 05:35am Jul 18, 2002 EST (#3130 of 3327)

Tech pleiotropik "The Media Business (A Moderated Forum)" 7/16/02 12:08pm

lchic - 05:48am Jul 18, 2002 EST (#3131 of 3327)

Showalter - if you/your computer are being harassed by a delinquent - on the government payroll - then it's time for Congress to look more closely at what money is going where and to whom it's being paid.

lchic - 06:01am Jul 18, 2002 EST (#3132 of 3327)

""There is a sense in Washington that though there may well have been improprieties in Mr Bush's dealings, these could be very small beer compared with the goings-on at Halliburton
http://www.guardian.co.uk/bush/story/0,7369,757217,00.html

lchic - 06:13am Jul 18, 2002 EST (#3133 of 3327)

"" Royal Bank of Scotland has emerged as the driver behind a deal to take control of struggling telecoms group Energis, using strong-arm tactics to persuade the company's other 15 banks to join in the bid.

The banks, which lent Energis almost £700m earlier this year, met on Tuesday to discuss an improved offer from venture capital bidders Apax Partners, Carlyle Group and Credit Suisse First Boston. http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4459832,00.html

More Messages Recent Messages (194 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Email to Sysop  Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us