New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's
war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars"
defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make
the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an
application of science be successful? Is a militarized space
inevitable, necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a
new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every
Thursday.
(2846 previous messages)
rshow55
- 04:43pm Jul 2, 2002 EST (#2847
of 2856)
Some questions for a 4th of July discussion seem well worth
discussing. MD2812 rshow55
7/1/02 8:51am
MD2641 rshow55
6/20/02 12:57pm
The things Eisenhower warned of in his FAREWELL ADDRESS of
January 17, 1961 http://www.geocities.com/~newgeneration/ikefw.htm
have happened.
There are a lot of things that need to be fixed. They can be. A
lot of it will take reframings - - redemptive solutions.
Every once in a while, I daydream, and ask myself "what's the
best thing that might happen, right here, to make a lot of
things better, in an aesthetically interesting way?" Here's a
thought:
What would happen if J.C. Watts did decide to run again - but
as a Democrat?
I think that would be beautiful, and a great service to his
constituents, to Watts himself, and to the country.
There's an ugly situation described here - one that Watts is
partly responsible for:
In Virginia, Young Conservatives Learn How to Develop and Use
Their Political Voices by Blaine Harden http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/11/politics/11CONS.html
Watts knows about a whole lot of related ugly situations - and is
complicit in them. I can't imagine him quitting, if he wasn't uneasy
about what he'd done and been associated with. Watts could redeem
that ugly situation, and a lot else, by changing parties.
You could write a good story about the good things that might
happen if he did so! Maybe a warm, real, heartwarming story.
Liked this quote:
I once sent a dozen of my friends a telegram
saying 'flee at once - all is discovered.' They all left town
immediately. . . . Mark Twain
Sometimes, when all is discovered, there are better resolutions.
Going off to see A Beautiful Mind a second time.
rshow55
- 10:56pm Jul 2, 2002 EST (#2848
of 2856)
Rumsfeld Says U.S. May Not Join Future Peacekeeping
Missions By THOM SHANKER and JAMES DAO http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/02/international/02CND-FORCE.html
"The policy says much about how the last, lone
superpower will project force abroad. When added to the emerging
policy of pre-emptive military action against nations or shadowy
terrorist cells armed with weapons of mass destruction, the United
States is saying boldly that American power will be exercised
unilaterally and, if exercised in alliance with others, on
Washington's terms.
"This presents America's partners and the world
with a stark choice: If American military power is needed to quiet
the world's trouble spots, the rules of that operation will be
written by America, not by international legal bodies.
Rumsfeld is taking an insane, pernicious position. International
legal bodies have to have real power.
The rest of the world has a very real stake in seeing that they
do.
Anthrax? The F.B.I. Yawns By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/02/opinion/02KRIS.html
Everyone Is Outraged By PAUL KRUGMAN http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/02/opinion/02KRUG.html
Could the Bush administration really be as irreponsible, corrupt,
and criminal as it often seems to be? Nation states all over the
world have a stake in determining that answer for themselves - and
in asking Americans to look at the facts.
The contrast between the situation Kristof describes, and my
situation - illustrates a good deal. There may be other
explanations, but for the life of me, I can't come up with any
explanations that can decently stand the light of day. It seems to
me that both the Bush's, father and son, should be
ashamed.
I believe that the following articles bear careful reading by
responsible people all over the world.:
In Virginia, Young Conservatives Learn How to Develop and Use
Their Political Voices by Blaine Harden http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/11/politics/11CONS.html
Elder Bush in Big G.O.P. Cast Toiling for Top Equity Firm
by LESLIE WAYNE http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/05/politics/05CARL.html
ARMED TO EXCESS by Bob Kerrey http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/02/opinion/02KERR.html
Concerts Rock the Tiny Kingdom of Skullbonia by NEIL
STRAUSS http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/30/arts/30SKUL.html?pagewanted=all
lchic's Cartoon GU - Bush - World Court .... http://www.guardian.co.uk/cartoons/0,7371,337484,00.html
seems all too appropriate and fair, and I think Americans should be
ashamed - and concerned enough to pay attention, and get some things
changed.
Question: In the last two years, anybody found a technical
mistake in anything I've left standing on this thread that has
mattered? Some things need to be fixed.
Some progress has been made. MD1999 rshow55
5/4/02 10:35am ... MD2000 rshow55
5/4/02 10:39am MD2001 rshow55
5/4/02 11:36am
lchic
- 06:59am Jul 3, 2002 EST (#2849
of 2856)
Showalter, interesting to re-read Kline's letter, his writing is
so considered yet encompassing http://www.wisc.edu/rshowalt/klinerec
A second trip to the Cinema to see 'A beautiful mind' .. it
certainly is a presentation that leaves one a little stunned by the
time the credits roll.
lchic
- 07:01am Jul 3, 2002 EST (#2850
of 2856)
Plane Crash: The Swiss air traffic controllers are admitting that
their automatic system was switched off - and the pilot of the
Russian plane had under a minute to respond. Why all the focus on
the ONE plane - what's the story with the Boeing?
(6
following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Missile Defense
|