New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (17083 previous messages)

rshow55 - 09:45am Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17084 of 17106)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

I'm groggy - didn't get much sleep last night.

I thought the National Conference on Media Reform went wonderfully well - and was fun, too.

After it broke up, around 1:30, I got a video media guy to come home for dinner with me -and by 6:00, had a couple of other video people from the conference. My wife got to show off her cooking, and our china and crystal - had a turkey, salad, a vegitarian lasagna (one of the guys was a veggie ) beer, a good bottle of Gundlach-Bundschu red wine - and a lot of talk. Got to look at a bunch of videos. The guys were the principles of

Earth Television

and

INN http://www.radiofreeamerica.tv/ .

Stayed up with one of the guys most of the night - he stayed over, and I got him to an early plane.

So I've got at lot of catching up to do (and some a nap to take ).

These guys were a lot farther to the left than I am about a lot of stuff - at heart, I'm basically an Eisenhower Republican . ( Just like chicks and imprinting, I guess. )

Still, one way or another it seems to me I learned about new possibilities for thanking and praising the New York Times for the massive effort and good faith that some people have gone to on this thread. With just a few reservations, as anybody would expect.

I started this year with this:

rshow55 - 08:20am Jan 1, 2003 EST (# 7177 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.AaDsbXtXWXy.2545918@.f28e622/8700

"I think this is a year where some lessons are going to have to be learned about stability and function of international systems, in terms of basic requirements of order , symmetry , and harmony - at the levels that make sense - and learned clearly and explicitly enough to produce systems that have these properties by design, not by chance."

Maybe there will be a chance to get some of that message out, anyway. With internet video coordinated with internet text and TV - some communication patterns are possible that didn't exist not long ago.

Off for a while _ I'm taking a nap. I appreciate the chance I've been given to post here.

cantabb - 10:14am Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17085 of 17106)

lchic - 06:38am Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17077 of 17084)

Nobody reads the Cantabbulator's gibberish - save your breath!

Apparently you STILL do. Or else, you wouldn't respond.

What happened to your on-again-off-again "Ignore" charade ?

It's your "gibberish" that was "exposed," so "save your breath," your S-P-A-M and let your over-worked link-machine rest !

cantabb - 10:20am Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17086 of 17106)

lchic - 06:39am Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17078 of 17085)

Common Provision - the need for - USA

lchic - 07:20am Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17079 of 17085)

ECHO e c h o echo ECHO ....That was then --- this is now

lchic - 07:35am Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17080 of 17085)

"This place is wretched enough -

lchic - 07:41am Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17081 of 17085)

lchic - 07:51am Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17082 of 17085)

lchic - 07:55am Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17083 of 17085)

"" The bombing provoked near-universal outrage among Saudis,.... Until the late 1990s, it was occupied and sponsored by ...

More S-P-A-M.

It's over.... thanks to you & rshow !!

'Say Good Night, Gracie...'

cantabb - 10:23am Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17087 of 17106)

rshow55 - 09:45am Nov 10, 2003 EST (# 17084 of 17086)

I'm groggy - didn't get much sleep last night. I thought the National Conference on Media Reform went wonderfully well - and was fun, too.........

Off for a while _ I'm taking a nap.

NOTHING of relevance here !

I appreciate the chance I've been given to post here.

Heard that hundreds of times before. And also threats to NYT. What an "oscillation" !

More Messages Recent Messages (19 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense