New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (16835 previous messages)

cantabb - 09:49am Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16836 of 16986)

lchic - 10:16pm Nov 7, 2003 EST (# 16810 of 16833)

lchic spamming once again. Over 20 posts of irrelevance (may be a smidgen of old MD stuff in one or 2).

Just as her leader rshow, she still fails to realize that it’s the end of the road for them.

She posts about everything, EXCEPT anything on the same question she (like a Commandant) has been demanding of others [same evasive techniques as her leader, rshow on the questions asked of him]:

Lchic: Let the truth out on your [lchic’s] employment affiliation and her interest (if any at all) in this thread or topic.

So exactly 'what is the New York Times' ? Google | NYT Ethics in journalism ethical journalism ? What should every journalist know ? Why must they keep up to date under changing circumstance Pages and Pages of it .....

So, exactly who employs lchic and what’s her interest here : Other than, chime in with her esteemed leader.

How about 'the truth' of THIS: "ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation" ?

Easier said ?

lchic - 10:19pm Nov 7, 2003 EST (# 16811 of 16833)

NYT Ethics in Journalism_07

So ? Anything on MD there ? I know you don't like NYT treatment of rshow -- but anything on the extensive abuse of this thread by you and rshow for 3 years ?

lchic - 10:29pm Nov 7, 2003 EST (# 16812 of 16833)

1998 "This country has a history of regulating those industries that do not control themselves,"….

Nothing relevant

lchic - 10:44pm Nov 7, 2003 EST (# 16813 of 16833)

Howdy Neighbour / Arthur Sulzberger "" ..... My job – your job – is not to make policy, but rather to help our citizens understand the issues they face and the choices their leaders make. The "Age of Proximity" has arrived and it is not just about enhanced access to news and information. It is about something far more important ……

Nothng on MD .... ut you just wanted to post anything you dig up on NYT.

lchic - 10:48pm Nov 7, 2003 EST (# 16814 of 16833)

Repeat of Post # 16814 Howdy Neighbour / Arthur Sulzberger ………..

lchic - 10:50pm Nov 7, 2003 EST (# 16815 of 16833)

Now, in 2003, we are in the midst of our second ten-year plan. We are committed to building our portfolio of multiple media properties aimed at capturing the lucrative national – and now international – knowledge audience served by The New York Times. ……

Irrelevant to MD

lchic - 10:55pm Nov 7, 2003 EST (# 16816 of 16833)

Apcar "" Today, we have 11 million registered users who have come to NYTimes.com at least once in the last year. ……

So... ?

lchic - 11:02pm Nov 7, 2003 EST (# 16818 of 16833)

NYT Scandal Has Legs! http://slate.msn.com/id/2083359/&;; May 2003 - Blair

Nothing new. Nothing on MD.

lchic - 11:08pm Nov 7, 2003 EST (# 16819 of 16833)

'Start spreading the news .... I'm leaving today ... " It's been a pleasure, a joy, and an education working on this board with it's cast of characters including Alex, Gisterme, Jorian, Margaret Drabble, Cantabb, Paul.J.F., Cooper, Broadsheets and media of the world, and 'The Poster' incarnate in multiple monikers ... but always 'The Poster'. ……..I did go on to try the Home Brand Tuna advocated by Dame Elizabeth Murdoch ... it was fine :)

A re-post of what you’d posted earlier ! As rshow does so very often. Are you going to post this a few more times before Nov 14 ?

lchic - 12:00am Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16822 of 16833)

Missile "One is never perceived, one is received" OUCH! Eugene Delacroix: "One is never perceived, one is received." …..

Totally irrelevant link..

lchic - 12:26am Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16823 of 16833)

From Rumsfeld: "The message is that there are no knowns. ……

Irrelevant.

lchic - 12:49am Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16824 of 16833)

cantabb - 09:49am Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16837 of 16986)

lchic - 12:49am Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16824 of 16833)

Nothing new. May be in Oz.

lchic - 12:52am Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16825 of 16833)

Questions raised over missile shield effectiveness PM - Thursday, 27 February , 2003 00:00:00 MARK COLVIN: From a United States point of view, Australia makes a prime partner in the so-called “Son of Star Wars” program, not least because of our geographical position in the southern hemisphere. ……

Old stuff….

lchic - 12:55am Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16826 of 16833)

Australia : increase in military spending : equipment upgrades…

Ah, Oz news !

lchic - 01:02am Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16827 of 16833)

DOH! | Murdoch's Fox News channel threatened to sue the makers of The Simpsons because of program parodied the channel's right-wing political stance.

Irrelevant

lchic - 01:04am Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16828 of 16833)

MORAL RESPONSIBILITY (war) - Minister sued

Irrelevant…

lchic - 01:46am Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16829 of 16833)

from ABC Australia 'The World Today' ... the implication being that folks ARE responsible for irresponsible decision making…

Irrelevant

lchic - 01:48am Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16830 of 16833)

Pvt Lynch ||

Irrelevant

lchic - 02:01am Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16831 of 16833)

"If democracy is to flourish, we need to hear different perspectives and views." Bernie Sanders ……

So ?

lchic - 02:04am Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16832 of 16833)

The business end of missiles Google | missile orders 2003

So, what do you have to say , other than just posting it ?

lchic - 06:54am Nov 8, 2003 EST (# 16833 of 16833)

Cuba Cubed - Guatemala

SO ?

More Messages Recent Messages (149 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense