New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (16572 previous messages)

cantabb - 11:52am Nov 5, 2003 EST (# 16573 of 16574)

rshow55 - 10:43am Nov 5, 2003 EST (# 16568 of 16568)

The things Eisenhower warned of in his Farewell Address have happened. We're in a mess - and it would be good to sort some things out - - gracefully.

No one in more "mess" than YOU seem to be ! Think "gracefully" !

rshow55 - 12:00pm Nov 5, 2003 EST (# 16574 of 16574)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Had a talk with the NYT line guy I've referred to before. I was glad we had a chance to converse - it clarified a good deal for me, and I think for him, as well. I was comfortable with the call, and it seems entirely consistent with what I need for grace - considering the NYT's needs for grace, as well.

I'll be writing a short note to him - and as far as I'm concerned, the sooner the forum closes from here, the better. Though I'd personally be happy to have it archived indefinitely, with a search facility - not that it will be, or should be in the larger scheme of things.

I'm not sure the line guy I talked to knew my key concerns until we talked a little while - - and I wasn't nearly as clear about his concerns prior to talking. Formats do what they do - and a thread like this - superb for some things - is inadequate for others.

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense


To post a message, compose your text in the box below, then click on Post My Message (below) to send the message.

Message:



You cannot rewrite history, but you will have 30 minutes to make any changes or fixes after you post a message. Just click on the Edit button which follows your message after you post it.