New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (16410 previous messages)

cantabb - 08:55pm Nov 3, 2003 EST (# 16411 of 16414)

rshow55 - 08:44pm Nov 3, 2003 EST (# 16409 of 16409)

" I was assigned to work on exception handling patterns that neither the formal intelligence apparatus, nor the private sector as it was, nor the academic community could handle - in ways that I thought then, and still think, made sense in the overall national interest - and in the interest of our capitalistic system, our political system - and the academy.

You mean something nebulous and undefined !

"In an effort not to leak - but also to live my life - and make contributions I had a right to make - consistent with the national interest as well as my own - I have tried to "come in through the New York Times" - as Casey had instructed. It has worked well in some ways - awkwardly for others.

No evidence of that.

There's a lot of support to my story -

BUT you have NOT presented an iota !

I've long deserved a face-to-face hearing.

With whom ? Ike & Casey are NOT here. CIA has told you it has NO interest in your activity. Then, who is it that you have been trying to see and for what ?

From your ambiguities and dodging pertinent questions, I get the feeling you are not really interested in resolving whatever problems you think you have. You'd rather live with them and continue to blame others.

bluestar23 - 09:00pm Nov 3, 2003 EST (# 16412 of 16414)

"Whether you happen to "call me Ishmael" "

Just Shut the hell up, Showalter....

bluestar23 - 09:04pm Nov 3, 2003 EST (# 16413 of 16414)

"There's a lot of support to my story -"

There's NO SUPPORT for your "story"...NONE at all...you've PRESENTED NOTHING>.....

More Messages Recent Messages (1 following message)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense