New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (16236 previous messages)

lchic - 08:13pm Nov 2, 2003 EST (# 16237 of 16302)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

Cantabb did i say i'd been talking to Showalter for four years or did i say we were into our fourth year of talking .....

As above Cantabb --- you've issued the challenge to Showalter to do what he says and deliver the goods - so to speak.

Are the problems handed to him by Eisenhower simple or complex ... obviously complex or Ike would have solved them for himself.

Showalter says he has solutions to complex - inter/national stumpers ... Cantabb wants to knowm more .... William CASEY advised Showalter that 'when he had answers to come in through the New York Times' .... Showalter says HE HAS ANSWERS ....

So what's the hitch Cantabb ... if Showalter's life's work is in the true National Interest - why not ease it through rather than BLOCK it?

bluestar23 - 08:28pm Nov 2, 2003 EST (# 16238 of 16302)

"Showalter's life's work is in the true National Interest - why not ease it through rather than BLOCK it?'

Because the basic "claim" itself is so ridiculous and moronic (like You both) that there is no need for a RATIONAL person to listen to it in the FIRST Place...

lchic - 08:28pm Nov 2, 2003 EST (# 16239 of 16302)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

Showalter says the National Times is a fine institution - the best America has ...

What is it that makes a paper great?

Was the Times once great - or - is the Times still Great?

What is it that makes a paper?

Is it management or readership ... or the marrying of each to the other.

Who's at the helm? Who used to be at the helm? With these people would the interests of the entity be paramount? What are the interests of the entity.

S U R V I V A L

is often the first interest

and the NYT has survived for a long long time

to survive has to mean being in tune with the TRUE INTERESTS of the readership

And so the Captains of NYT have had to have demonstrated and catered to both internal and external environmental demands upon it in a regardful and prioritized order.

Where the NYT is a customer of yet another entity - and the same a custmer of it, then, there has to be careful thought and consideration as to how to steer forward through historical time zones with due regard to moral responsibilities for the wider community.

----

lchic - 08:30pm Nov 2, 2003 EST (# 16240 of 16302)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

Speaking historically a french constitutional philosopher looked over to England and saw a well run ship sailing on calm waters as cp to the chaos of Europe.

What made England 'different' he asked.

lchic - 08:32pm Nov 2, 2003 EST (# 16241 of 16302)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

Showlater had you called in at Chicago Uni you might have viewed this document:

    .... Were this a true Representative, and free from external Force or private Bribery, nothing could pass there but what they thought was for the publick Advantage. For their own Interest is so interwoven with the Peoples, that if they act for themselves (which every one of them will do as near as he can) they must act for the common Interest of England. And if a few among them should find it their Interest to abuse their Power, it will be the Interest of all the rest to punish them for it: and then our Government would act mechanically, and a Rogue will as naturally be hang'd as a Clock strike twelve when the hour is come. This is the Fountain-Head from whence the People expect all their Happiness, and the Redress of their Grievances; and if we can preserve them free from Corruption, they will take care to keep every body else so. .....
http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch10s4.html

lchic - 08:33pm Nov 2, 2003 EST (# 16242 of 16302)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

Separation of Powers

is an important concept for smooth sailing. It enables one zone to moderate and 'check' another.

More Messages Recent Messages (60 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense