New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(15251 previous messages)
wrcooper
- 11:26pm Oct 19, 2003 EST (#
15252 of 15263)
In re: http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.ncKgbVZcQAT.3612911@.f28e622/16960
Lou:
You and I agree that the NMD money would be
better spent on Lunar or Mars Colonies.
Yes, it would be better spent on developing the peaceful
uses of outer space. The threat that the system is supposed to
defend us against doesn’t exist, and the system they’re
proposing to use doesn’t work and shouldn’t be deployed.
At least a defensive system articulates our
position.
I think that a workable defensive system would be fine and
dandy. If we were serious, we could export the technology to
our friends, and to our enemies, so that they’d have to reason
to doubt our motives. If it really worked, that would, as B
gisterme said, provide a rationale for complete disarmament.
If the missiles aren’t good for anything, why keep them
around? The problem is that the thing is technologically
flawed. Furthermore, it’s strategically flawed in that, the
better it works, the more incentive it gives our adversaries
to use low-tech delivery methods for their NBC weapons.
NMD is insurance.
No, it’s pork barrel and snake oil.
We're good people and our children deserve
to be safe from the slings and arrows.....
Yes! But the Bush administration’s NMD program isn’t going
to make us any safer. It actually will probably make us less
safe.
wrcooper
- 11:35pm Oct 19, 2003 EST (#
15253 of 15263)
Oops
That's "no reason to doubt our motives".
lchic
- 11:43pm Oct 19, 2003 EST (#
15254 of 15263) ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has
to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
The link between
The Emperor's New Clothes
and
Star Wars
is the commission
In the first the Tailor took it,
The Emperor's curiosity got the better of him and he
decided to see the two scoundrels.
"Besides being invisible, your Highness, this cloth will be
woven in colors and patterns created especially for you." The
emperor gave the two men a bag of gold coins in exchange for
their promise to begin working on the fabric immediately.
"Just tell us what you need to get started and we'll give
it to you." The two scoundrels asked for a loom, silk, gold
thread and then pretended to begin working. The Emperor
thought he had spent his money quite well: in addition to
getting a new extraordinary suit, he would discover which of
his subjects were ignorant and incompetent. A few days later,
he called the old and wise prime minister, who was considered
by everyone as a man with common sense.
"Go and see how the work is proceeding," the Emperor told
him, "and come back to let me know."
The prime minister was welcomed by the two scoundrels.
"We're almost finished, but we need a lot more gold thread.
Here, Excellency! Admire the colors, feel the softness!" The
old man bent over the loom and tried to see the fabric that
was not there. He felt cold sweat on his forehead.
"I can't see anything," he thought. "If I see nothing, that
means I'm stupid! Or, worse, incompetent!" If the prime
minister admitted that he didn't see anything, he would be
discharged from his office.
"What a marvelous fabric, he said then. "I'll certainly
tell the Emperor." The two scoundrels rubbed their hands
gleefully. They had almost made it. More thread was requested
to finish the work.
Finally, the Emperor received the announcement that the two
tailors had come to take all the measurements needed to sew
his new suit.
"Come in," the Emperor ordered. Even as they bowed, the two
scoundrels pretended to be holding large roll of fabric.
"Here it is your Highness, the result of our labour," the
scoundrels said. "We have worked night and day but, at last,
the most beautiful fabric in the world is ready for you. Look
at the colors and feel how fine it is."
in the latter :
lchic
- 11:44pm Oct 19, 2003 EST (#
15255 of 15263) ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has
to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
Reagan's bubble
SIR – I had occasion to speak confidentially with Edward
Teller during Ronald Reagan's second term (Obituary, September
20th). As he was credited with authorship of the Strategic
Defence Initiative (“Star Wars”), I asked him how it came
about. He said that Reagan fashioned a bubble with his hands
and said, “I wish I could put a protective shield over the
country—to keep evil people from doing us harm.” Teller told
the president his vision was possible.
I asked Teller if it would work. “Now? No,” he said and I
asked why. He gave a bored shrug: “The technology doesn't
exist.” This was an astounding admission from the chief
architect of Star Wars. Though it failed it is still credited
with hastening the downfall of the Soviet Union. Teller
displayed a profound lack of interest in the morality of
launching a massive programme he knew would not work, and an
overriding interest in the morality of defeating America's
enemies.
Grant Stockdale Washington, DC
Letters - Economist - Oct 16th 2003
http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayStory.cfm?story_id=2137572
(8 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|