New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(14299 previous messages)
rshow55
- 03:45pm Oct 4, 2003 EST (#
14300 of 14302) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
I'm going on - there's not much to the last post, in my
opinion.
I'm saying that going around in circles is
essential to much human logic - and can convege -
though it need not. Cantabb is, in general, against the
idea. We're dealing with subject matter here that science
writers - and "average readers of The New York Times"
care about - and it seems to me that illustration of
difficulties with "connections of the dots" is
worth talking about - and relates to missile defense - ( imho
) because there is already much on this board about the
technology of missile defense that can be focused and largely
validaded by internal crosscheckings - many of them recursive.
Can such things converge ? Some "connections of
the dots" do not converge - and people make emotion
- laden jokes about it. I liked these pieces, that deal with
problems of recursion without sufficient convergence - and for
all I know, Cantabb might, as well ( though he may
object to having them on this board. )
MIRROR MIRROR A History of the Human Love Affair
With Reflection. By Mark Pendergrast. Illustrated. 404 pp.
New York: Basic Books. . . was reviewed in
'Mirror Mirror': Lens Crafters By LIESL SCHILLINGER
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/10/books/review/10SCHILL.html
"PSST -- want to save $160,000? Don't send
your son to college; slip him this book instead. It
shoehorns an entire liberal arts education into a cultural
history of mirrors that touches on architecture,
anthropology, sex, painting, myth, religion, math, science,
magic, astronomy, literature, business, espionage and
warfare, and travels from the Big Bang to the rise and fall
of the Greek and Roman Empires, the waxing and waning of the
Middle Ages, the Renaissance, the discovery of the New World
and, at last, space: the final frontier. Anyone who masters
the contents of ''Mirror Mirror'' need never fear Trivial
Pursuit again.
"In the last dozen years or so, a spate of
books has capitalized on the public's fascination with
certain of the more easily recognized nouns (tobacco, salt
and pencils quickly come to mind) and the halo of factoids
that surrounds them. Mark Pendergrast is no stranger to this
type of literary ''Jeopardy!,'' having previously produced
two books about beverages, one on Coca-Cola, one on coffee.
This time he goes meta, embracing the broadest conception of
his noun possible, thought up by a Basran Persian named Abu
Ali al-Hasan ibn al-Haytham (known in the West as Alhazen)
1,000 years ago (''Every visible object that is not a direct
light source is a kind of mirror''), while adding a proviso
by the 13th-century English theologian Robert Grosseteste
(''Each thing contains all other things'') and a caution
from modern astrophysicists (all these things may exist in
duplicate, triplicate or infinicate in ''multiple mirror
universes being created all the time'').
"How could a subject so all-embracing fail
to grab the interest of any but the most blamably incurious
shut-in? And yet, how does one pay attention to . . .
everything? Luckily, the book's title turns out to be a
misnomer; the author cares little for the looking glass,
which he deplores as a vicious tool that ''helped transform
the United States into a pleasure-seeking, vain,
celebrity-driven society.'' He is interested in the
telescope, whose powers depend on mirrored lenses. En
route to his true focus (the mirror in science), Pendergrast
screeches past the checkpoints in the history of reflection
in a no-brakes Grand Prix through Western Civ 101.
(2 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|