Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Its the substance ....
it's mightier than the sword and ...... Gisterme
mightier than the pen and its text.
I think Lincoln could agree with the con..text were he
present today
Present in ways ... that KAEP matter ... to KAEP everyone.
*******
Sorry Gisterme .. there's no way you are the Prez! Say you
aren't the other Prez ... you know Elvis? Wouldn't mind a pink
Caddy bro.
rshow55
- 08:16am Sep 26, 2003 EST (#
14006 of 14016)
Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
Fighting is sometimes useful and sometimes not. The rule
"never fight" is a good one - but there need to be exceptions
that work.
We need to know when it is useful or necessary to fight,
when it isn't - know how to fight better - know how to avoid
fights better - in specific cases - including specific cases
that require switching.
When people disagree about logical structure
a limited fight may be useful (or may not be) - but
an explosive - escalatory fight is usually not useful.
When people disagree about facts a
limited fight may be useful (or may not be) - but an
explosive - escalatory fight is usually not useful.
When people disagree about how much
different things matter a limited fight may be useful
(or may not be) - but an explosive - escalatory fight is
usually not useful.
When people disagree about team
identifications a limited fight may be useful (or may
not be) - but an explosive - escalatory fight is usually not
useful.
When things need to be worked out well enough
for cooperation that is worth it - we have to
be able to evaluate these questions with more sophistication
and humanity.
Many things have their place - and the urge to punish
cheats can be useful http://www.mrshowalter.net/UrgeToPunishCheatsNotJustHumanButSelfless.htm
But like other passions - it can misfire. These days, as in
the past, it does misfire - in lethal and destructive ways -
much too often.
How many people actually know this - in cases where
it actually matters and they have emotional interests
at stake?
It looks to me like more people need to.
almarst2002
- 09:07am Sep 26, 2003 EST (#
14007 of 14016)
U.S. Remains Leader in Global Arms Sales, Report Says - http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/25/international/25ARMS.html?ex=1065463954&ei=1&en=cfbb009fb2563042
The United States maintained its dominance in the
international arms market last year, especially in sales to
developing nations !!!!!!
THE WORDS ... AND THE SWORDS.
rshow55
- 09:52am Sep 26, 2003 EST (#
14008 of 14016)
Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
13275 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.S7OjbM2nIzQ.2025301@.f28e622/14960
Menken on politics, from Quotes From H. L. Mencken
http://watchfuleye.com/mencken.html
" It is hard to believe that a man is
telling the truth when you know that you would lie if you
were in his place."
Both words and deeds matter. There are some things to be
said against this thread - but one of the things to say
for it is that fredmoore's on it. Search
fredmoore . A lot of good stuff, I'd say. I especially
like the one about the mosquito and the elephant.
Intellectuals are a lot like mosquitos in that joke. - -
but sometimes they get something right.
There's been a lot of posting since http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.S7OjbM2nIzQ.2025301@.f28e622/15386
, which starts
. There's an unsolved problem in the
world about end games - and it is a big problem.
And even more postings since I suggested an exercise for
Russians and Americans March 23, 2001 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b085/398
at the end of http://www.mrshowalter.net/PutinBriefing.html
That exercise was too much to ask - because people don't
know
. How to agree to disagree clearly,
without fighting, comfortably, so that they can cooperate
stably, safely, and productively.
If they could learn - we could all do a lot better. If they
do learn - almarst's hard work on this thread
will be a big part of the reason.
(8 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense