New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(13998 previous messages)
rshow55
- 07:12am Sep 26, 2003 EST (#
13999 of 14006) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
I really liked this piece this morning:
Dogged Engineer's Effort to Assess Shuttle Damage By
JAMES GLANZ and JOHN SCHWARTZ http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/26/national/nationalspecial/26ENGI.html
12910-11 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.gSpEbbepI0C.1926605@.f28e622/14586
. . . http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.gSpEbbepI0C.1926605@.f28e622/14587
We're "wired up" so that, unless we learn some
things - we'll continue to make lethal mistakes with
monotonous regularity - and the world will remain much uglier
than it would be if we could only learn how we go wrong - by
"being nice" in the wrong place - when right answers are
needed.
rshow55
- 07:16am Sep 26, 2003 EST (#
14000 of 14006) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
How many people actually know
. How to agree to disagree clearly,
without fighting, comfortably, so that they can cooperate
stably, safely, and productively.
Anybody?
Could there be technical and logical problems
involved?
Sure looks that way to me.
When fights happen - I'm not a bit sure that people are all
that clear, specifically, about why they are fighting.
lchic
- 07:19am Sep 26, 2003 EST (#
14001 of 14006) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
Some posters even 'bicker' here, on this board.
lchic
- 07:32am Sep 26, 2003 EST (#
14002 of 14006) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
Were an historical figure of yore
To emerge today
To check out culture (including MD culture)
To compare the 'Then' with the 'Now'
Would they be surprised by 'Advancement' or the lack of it
?
rshow55
- 07:49am Sep 26, 2003 EST (#
14003 of 14006) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
With good staffing - the most interesting answer would be
both .
We've worked through some necessary conditions to
prosperity and international cooperation.
We're still missing just a few.
Cantabb made a telling point in 13964
. Cantabb: "Peace making" reuires
much more than wishful thinking.
And indeed it does ! But there are necessary
conditions to stable peacemaking - and it they are not
known - stable, humanly workable peacemaking is
strictly impossible. Here are necessary
conditions - and I'm not claiming they are new - but only
that they are necessary conditions that people don't
know - and don't want to see.
For stable end games - people and groups have to be
workably clear on these key questions.
How do they disagree (agree) about
logical structure ?
How do they disagree (agree) about facts
?
How do they disagree (agree) about questions
of how much different things matter ?
How do they differ in their team
identifications ?
Odds are good that if the patterns of agreement (or
disagreement) are STABLE and KNOWN they can be decently
accomodated.
Even a child should know the things above - and kids could
be taught them. Adults need to know them, too.
Most people, including most leaders - do not know
this - Nash didn't know this result. It is a result both
Eisenhowers wanted desperately:
. Odds are good that if the patterns of
agreement (or disagreement) are STABLE and KNOWN they can be
decently accomodated.
Is the statement "diffuse" ? In the sense that logically
incremental leadership is diffuse, it is. But it is
necessary for people to learn this - if peace making is
ever to be stable.
(3 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|